How America's elite hijacked a massacre to take revenge on Sarah Palin

None more so than with Sarah Palin, a politician who is almost as divisive as the President. The former Republican vice-presidential contender has become a spiritual figurehead for many Tea Party supporters, but is loathed by many on the Left.

So it was that within minutes of the Tucson shooting, anti-Palin internet bloggers and Twitter users were highlighting a so-called ‘target map’ Mrs Palin had posted on her Facebook page last March."

History shows how dangerous it is to try to second-guess the motives of political assassins.

John Hinckley shot Ronald Reagan because he was obsessed with the actress Jodie Foster, not because he hated Right-wingers.
Likewise, Lynette Fromme tried to shoot Gerald Ford because she revered the cult killer Charles Manson.

But those lessons from ­history won’t stop some Democrats exploiting the shooting of a nine-year-old girl and five others at the weekend with precisely the sort of foam-flecked over-reaction for which they love to condemn their opponents on the Right.

revenge on Sarah Palin








Gene Simmons Military Tribute

Zell/Granny 2012

Send Your Thanks To the U.S.Military

Post a Message to our Soldiers

Of all the things I've lost,
I miss my mind the most
Grandpa Bob
Professional Fence Hanger / Spectator
Former Crew Chief
Grandma's Rocking Chair

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Grandma / Gpa,

Poor Sarah, having to defend herself. She uses the most terse, inflammatory speech and innuendo to incite response from her "groupies" and then when ANY question of her use of such lingo is brought forward, she responds with an even more antagonistic, divisive diatribe defending herself.

I sincerely doubt if she even knows what "blood libel" is or how the term came about.

quote:

Originally posted by BD:
Poor Sarah, having to defend herself. She uses the most terse, inflammatory speech and innuendo to incite response from her "groupies" and then when ANY question of her use of such lingo is brought forward, she responds with an even more antagonistic, divisive diatribe defending herself.

I sincerely doubt if she even knows what "blood libel" is or how the term came about.

BD,
How about explaining how there wasn't a single shred of evidence that linked any right wing rehtoric to this guy. In all actuality he is more left than right. How can the Sheriff state that it is right wing rehtoric when there is absolutly not a single piece of evidence that points to that, NONE. But, you hear everyone on the left making a reference to it.

Hey, even ole Billy Boy got into it. He stated that "We cannot be unaware of the fact that, particularly with the internet, there's this huge echo-chamber out there, and anything any of us says falls on the unhinged and the hinged alike, and we just have to be sensitive to it.

This is blaming anyone associated with WHAT? They try to portray this guy as a right winger when everything points to him being a loaner. You guys that don't get this and can't see it for what it really is need to have your heads examined. Look at the facts and quit listening to the left wing media. Heck, even Obamer was doing it last night on TV. It amazes me how the left just gets the pass on lies and deciet. I guess that is why most of you left wing nutt huggers lie all the time just to meet your agenda. It is very loathful, very loathful


He has done this before, remember the Oklahoma City bombing, Yep, blamed it on the extremeist right, actually Limbaugh, for when in FACT it was McVeigh hating what the current administration had done:
“At the trial of Timothy McVeigh, the US Government asserted that McVeigh’s motivation for the attack was to avenge the deaths two years earlier of Branch Davidians near Waco, Texas, whom he believed had been murdered by agents of the federal government.”

Maybe you should re read my post Steve. I did not lie about anything, nor attribute anything she said having anything to do with the shooting.

You are much too hasty to engage your fingers, before engaging your brain.

quote:

I sincerely doubt if she even knows what "blood libel" is or how the term came about.

Sarah Palin’s most dedicated Jewish supporters are sticking by the former Alaska governor after her comments Wednesday castigating journalists for committing what she called “blood libel.”

“The use of the term blood libel is appropriate,” said Benyamin Korn, director of Jewish Americans for Sarah Palin, which runs JewsForSarah.com. Korn, a longtime Jewish journalist and activist, says his group has several hundred members. The website got off the ground in April 2010.

“There’s been issues raised about how can it be a blood libel if it didn’t lead to bloodshed against her because blood libel led to bloodshed against Jews. That’s not always true,” Korn said. “I would not have advised her against [using] it if anyone would have asked me. I think it is appropriate. They accused her of inciting bloodshed. Now this is preposterous.”

Korn added that opponents of Palin are “leaping for ‘gotcha’ material against her.” Palin has long spoken about her support of Israel and her love of the Jewish people. She went so far as to hang an Israeli flag in her Anchorage office when she was the governor.

Another founder of Jewish Americans for Sarah, Dr. Nahum Duker, a professor of pathology at Temple University, also defended Palin, and said this is an example of language “living as it evolves.”

“The political far left using this as an excuse is beyond the bounds of political criticism. She has been far more civil in her discourse than a good many of her adversaries,” Duker said.

The term, “blood libel,” has been employed by a variety of conservative commentators in recent days, most prominently, law professor Glenn Reynolds, whose Wall Street Journal column Monday asked, “So as the usual talking heads begin their ‘have you no decency?’ routine aimed at talk radio and Republican politicians, perhaps we should turn the question around. Where is the decency in blood libel?”

Does anyone agree that we should look beyond "party" lines in electing people to office.

Seems you can be any kind of scoundrel as long as you are associated with a political party, Democrat or Republican alike.

"Talking heads"? The Repubs are doing more talking than anyone.

quote:

Originally posted by BD: "Talking heads"? The Repubs are doing more talking than anyone.

Really!?!? I think you're being intellectually dishonest with this statement, Wes!

It was the Democrats and liberals that immediately took to the airwaves and tried to make the Arizona shootings a political issue.

Typical leftist, spouts the socialist dumkey leftist ideology like a good little puppet and when his bull shyt is debunked he runs for cover spouting the "no party" mantra!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wes maybe you should turn the water on ?

quote:

Originally posted by BD:
Maybe you should re read my post Steve. I did not lie about anything, nor attribute anything she said having anything to do with the shooting.

You are much too hasty to engage your fingers, before engaging your brain.

BD,
MY BRAIN IS WELL ENGAGED, MORE THAN I CAN SAY FOR SOME ON HERE. I didn't say you said she had anything to do with it. What I was pointing out from teh very first post is the fact that you do not view each side with the same microscope, in all actuallity, you give the current admin a pass on just about everything. I don't consider you a left wing nutt hugger, although you are leaning ****her and ****her left by the day it seems.

It amazes me that you read everything that I posted yet didn't reflect on antyhing of fact that was in it, however, you do make a statement of perception fabrication as if I made a statement that you "attribute anything she said having to do with the shooting". My point was that others are doing that and you have not called them out or corrected them for it.
I have also posted what Billy, the local sheriff as well as most of the left leadership is doing on the "Rehtoric" front when it is all FABRICATION , yet you still do not call them out for that. That shows me you do not have an open mind and are becoming more of a drone. I call a spade a spade, regardless of political persuasion, VERY FEW on here do that. That is the problem with most, they just tote the party line regardless of position. this shows their inability to think for themselves, do research, understand the situation and make an informed, articulatable statement reflecting facts, not opinion or fabrication.

Now, next time you engage your fingers, you need to do some research and put an emphasis on comprehension.

To make a statement that the Repubs are the "Talking Heads" is an absolute LIE and Fabrication. SHOW THE PROOF IN THIS CASE WHERE ANY OF IT IS RELATED TO POLITICS ! NOW LOOK AT ALL THE NEWS SERVICES, POLITICIANS ON THE LEFT, THE SHERIFF, PELOSI, THE PRESIDENT, THE FORMER PRESIDENT, THE SEC OF STATE, ETC." that are seying it is rehtoric related.

According to the left-wing lame stream moron media UNEMPLOYMENT UNEXPECTEDLY jumped last week?
This was unexpected?
A survey done about six weeks ago found that employers planned to lay-off many more people then they did in January 2010, SO how could this be "unexpected"?

It's ironic, isn't it. We sit here and argue back and forth and it is these same arguments that have made Palin a millionaire. LOL

She knows what she's doing.

Has this country sank so far that for a person to be conceived as a conservative in any real sense has to embrace the likes of Sarah Palin? Is she all America has? If things are messed up now, elect Sarah Palin president, and see.

"My point was that others are doing that and you have not called them out or corrected them for it."


BD
DRR Top Comp
Picture of BD

Posted January 11, 2011 05:36 PM Hide Post

quote:
Originally posted by David Covey:
OK, Now that most of us agree that the symbol on both maps have meaning..

Who thinks the meaning was intended to instruct someone to blow away a political opponent?

Dave



I don't think that is the meaning. I know what the meaning is. Both maps showed "targeted" districts for overthrow of current regime.


_____________________________
Wes Scott

Under the water tower

Posts: 9036 | Location: Balmorhea, Texas | Registered: June 06, 2001 Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


IS IT MY POSITION TO CALL OUT EVERYONE THAT I MAY DISAGREE WITH?

Gene Simmons Military Tribute

Zell/Granny 2012

Send Your Thanks To the U.S.Military

Post a Message to our Soldiers

Of all the things I've lost,
I miss my mind the most
Grandpa Bob
Professional Fence Hanger / Spectator
Former Crew Chief
Grandma's Rocking Chair

quote:

It amazes me that you read everything that I posted yet didn't reflect on antyhing of fact that was in it, however, you do make a statement of perception fabrication as if I made a statement that you "attribute anything she said having to do with the shooting". My point was that others are doing that and you have not called them out or corrected them for it.
I have also posted what Billy, the local sheriff as well as most of the left leadership is doing on the "Rehtoric" front when it is all FABRICATION , yet you still do not call them out for that. That shows me you do not have an open mind and are becoming more of a drone. I call a spade a spade, regardless of political persuasion, VERY FEW on here do that. That is the problem with most, they just tote the party line regardless of position. this shows their inability to think for themselves, do research, understand the situation and make an informed, articulatable statement reflecting facts, not opinion or fabrication.


To make a statement that the Repubs are the "Talking Heads" is an absolute LIE and Fabrication. SHOW THE PROOF IN THIS CASE WHERE ANY OF IT IS RELATED TO POLITICS ! NOW LOOK AT ALL THE NEWS SERVICES, POLITICIANS ON THE LEFT, THE SHERIFF, PELOSI, THE PRESIDENT, THE FORMER PRESIDENT, THE SEC OF STATE, ETC." that are seying it is rehtoric related.

Another miss, guess that selective reading and comprehension is at it again. And to think you stated I needed to engage my brain. Nice try Wes but your posts reflect differently.

Maybe I am not so insecure as to think I have to try to impress my will or thoughts on others, and "call them out" like some 6th grader on the playground when their views differ from mine.

No thank you. I make my own decisions, and generally discount what anyone else thinks. I personally do not have to listen to Beck, Limbaugh, or Palin to form my opinions.

If others do not agree with me, so what? I don't care if they do or not.

BTW, Steve, you own a Glock 19 perhaps?

Gene Simmons Military Tribute

Zell/Granny 2012

Send Your Thanks To the U.S.Military

Post a Message to our Soldiers

Of all the things I've lost,
I miss my mind the most
Grandpa Bob
Professional Fence Hanger / Spectator
Former Crew Chief
Grandma's Rocking Chair

quote:

Originally posted by BD:
BTW, Steve, you own a Glock 19 perhaps?

So by making the statement that you "aren't insecure because of your views", you would rather be ill-informed or have your beliefs be based on nontruths or just turn a blind eye to ALL of the facts not just the ones that fit your agenda? If you generally discount what anyone else thinks then why do you follow the rhetoric and most of the statements from the left, why do you try and dump on Palin, Beck and Limbaugh so much? I do not listen to Rush or Paling, I listen to Beck sometimes for the historical aspect. I don't need to listen to the others; I do research to get my information. There is a lot of information out there, the left media only provides what is on their agenda (try and discount that one and you will lose a million to one and you know it), people like Limbaugh are out there to the right, Beck is more of a Constitutionalist and does a lot of research (either History or facts about people and brings it forward) and tries to put them all together, sometimes too much "conspiracy" theory but a lot of good facts (READ FACTS AND NOT OPINION) that you can weed through to make your own judgement.

I have an assortment of guns from 9mm to 44mag as well as rifles/shotguns from 20 guage to 7.62mm. What does that have to do with this conversation or is this another attempt at deflection since the facts are getting pretty solidified?

quote:

"aren't insecure because of your views"

If your going to quote me, quote me. I did not make that statement. I am very well informed and never turn a blind eye to a fact, but will not even consider conjecture.

Beck is nothing more than a common entertainer, and I use the term loosely, just as the rest. He bores hell out of me the time I actually watched some of his show. The man has the persona of a sloth.

About the gun, just asking.