Your still a fag. There is no soundness to your argument. I think maybe you are a jail house lawyer fag. Had years to sit around and teach yourself some Latin. **** Latin. I am an American and proud of my second grade education.

quote:

Originally posted by BD:
Your still a fag. There is no soundness to your argument. I think maybe you are a jail house lawyer fag. Had years to sit around and teach yourself some Latin. **** Latin. I am an American and proud of my second grade education.

quote:

Because you are acting pretty childishly you know,

Look out BD, little man might get fired up.

quote:

proud of my second grade education.

BK is getting there.

Gasp! Could it be, could revenues be at the core of "saving the planet"???

I think it just to appease all those "green" fags.

quote:

Originally posted by Canted Valve:
Gasp! Could it be, could revenues be at the core of "saving the planet"???

Again, we are little more than a pimple on the butt of this planet. To think that we are anything compared to what Mother Nature does is pure arrogance.

Gibbering dolts a pair, CV and Bucky! I have provided a refutation to this canard about volcanos spewing more CO2 than man, more than half a decade ago. Yet here you are spreading lies that just seem to get bigger and bigger as time goes by, now don’t they just. Dragracer Randy had it at more CO2 than man in 100 years for Mt. Saint Helens. Now it appears the Dolts deluxe have it at Mt. Etna erupting as more than all the CO2 in man’s history, even though the image appears to be about the equivalent of a flee **** in comparison to the Mt. Saint Helens eruption. So, once again here we have it,

"According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors."
So that means that ALL the volcanoes on earth and under the sea, not just the flee **** image of Mt. Etna, produce slightly more than 8 tenths of one percent of what man’s activities do on a yearly basis.

Man you guys really need to get a clue.

Posted February 27, 2010 10:15 AM
https://drr.infopop.cc/eve/foru...52/m/1791042992/p/71

Quote:
Originally posted by dragracer randy:
We end up finding out , more and more every day, of all the distorted facts and purposeful use of them to individuals benefits, about global warming! Seems those who supposedly were in the know scewered many facts to fit their mold!

Like I said before, Mt Saint Helens eruption put more pollution into the atmosphere than man has for the last 100 years.

That's not to say man's pollution isn't detrimental to the ecological equation, just to put into light how much more mother nature has an effect than us!


Here is just some of what I have found regarding CO2 and the Mt. St. Helens volcano in particular and volcanoes in general.

"According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors."

http://environment.about.com/o...ct/a/volcano-gas.htm

http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Volc...ption_msh_gases.html

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1994/of94-212/

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1994/o.../Derived/report.html

http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/home.html

More hoaxer sites?

The sources for supporting your assertions are where?

and again on
posted April 21, 2010 02:19 PM
https://drr.infopop.cc/eve/foru...52/m/1791042992/p/79

Village Idiot and Little Man, both full of it.

Climate Change: The Greatest-Ever Conspiracy Against The Taxpayer

Climate change is the biggest scam in the history of the world – a $1.5 trillion-a-year conspiracy against the taxpayer, every cent, penny and centime of which ends in the pockets of the wrong kind of people, none of which goes towards a cause remotely worth funding, all of it a complete and utter waste.
Here is an edited version of a speech on this subject



Augusta Warrior Project
Gpa

quote:

The sources for supporting your assertions are where?

You will never get an answer from bucky or cv much less they will read what you posted.

quote:

a $1.5 trillion-a-year conspiracy against the taxpayer, every cent, penny and centime of which ends in the pockets of the wrong kind of people, none of which goes towards a cause remotely worth funding, all of it a complete and utter was

Troll, scam!

Several factoids the HOAXERS would rather people not be aware of about renewable energy!
The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System off of I-15 just south of the Nevada state line cast $2,200,000,000.00 with $1.600,000,000.00 in federal loan guarantees!
This facility uses so much natural gas to function that it has to be regulated under the "fruits-an-nuts" state's cap-an-trade boondoggle!

Now it's developed that the boondoggle is falling so far short of projected production numbers that the "fruits-an-nuts" state Public Utility Commission has had to consider shutting it down!
Production in '14 was 45%, '15 a whopping 68% BUT the facility collected $200.00 per megawatt hour from PG&E compared to $35.00 per megawatt hour from natural gas fired plants!
That's only a 700% increase the "fruits-an-nuts" staters will see in their power bills down the road!!!!!

The fruits-an-nuts staters are used to being bent over and shafted so they'll take it laying down!!!!

quote:
You will never get an answer from bucky or cv much less they will read what you posted.


I'm not interested in endless bantering. I post what I feel is relevant and others are open to do the same. I have no desire to change anyone's mind. If you're not bright enough to see the truth though all the BS then that's your problem. Here's a little inside tip, follow the money and avoid the corrupt science. It tells all.

Augusta Warrior Project
Gpa

Increased Land Use by Chukchi Sea Polar Bears in Relation to Changing Sea Ice Conditions

Citation: Rode KD, Wilson RR, Regehr EV, St. Martin M, Douglas DC, Olson J (2015) Increased Land Use by Chukchi Sea Polar Bears in Relation to Changing Sea Ice Conditions. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0142213. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142213


Abstract

Recent observations suggest that polar bears (Ursus maritimus) are increasingly using land habitats in some parts of their range, where they have minimal access to their preferred prey, likely in response to loss of their sea ice habitat associated with climatic warming. We used location data from female polar bears fit with satellite radio collars to compare land use patterns in the Chukchi Sea between two periods (1986–1995 and 2008–2013) when substantial summer sea-ice loss occurred. In both time periods, polar bears predominantly occupied sea-ice, although land was used during the summer sea-ice retreat and during the winter for maternal denning. However, the proportion of bears on land for > 7 days between August and October increased between the two periods from 20.0% to 38.9%, and the average duration on land increased by 30 days. The majority of bears that used land in the summer and for denning came to Wrangel and Herald Islands (Russia), highlighting the importance of these northernmost land habitats to Chukchi Sea polar bears. Where bears summered and denned, and how long they spent there, was related to the timing and duration of sea ice retreat. Our results are consistent with other studies supporting increased land use as a common response of polar bears to sea-ice loss. Implications of increased land use for Chukchi Sea polar bears are unclear, because a recent study observed no change in body condition or reproductive indices between the two periods considered here. This result suggests that the ecology of this region may provide a degree of resilience to sea ice loss. However, projections of continued sea ice loss suggest that polar bears in the Chukchi Sea and other parts of the Arctic may increasingly use land habitats in the future, which has the potential to increase nutritional stress and human-polar bear interactions.



The complete article is available at the link below.

http://journals.plos.org/ploso...journal.pone.0142213

Thanks Little Man! Oh, the sky is falling!

I have seen the Light!

It really is a big HOAX!

“Senator Inhofe is right about one thing: there has been a climate hoax that continues today. It is the decades’ long campaign by a handful of the world’s largest fossil fuel companies—such as Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, and Peabody Energy—to deceive the American public by distorting the realities and risks of climate change, sometimes acting directly and sometimes acting indirectly through trade associations and front groups.”

“The fundamentals of global warming have been well established for generations. The idea that heat-trapping emissions could alter our climate dates back to the late 1800s (Weart 2015). By the 1950s, scientists knew that climate change could present significant risks to people and places (Weart 2015; Craig 1957; Revelle and Seuss 1957)”

But like most everything else most of the posse around here has it exactly ars backwards. Who could have guessed?

http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/de...ception-Dossiers.pdf

Fag.

But in 1957 they were closet fags