quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:
Mr. muck, Larry is right on after reading your response.

Mr. Muck, just what part of my post don't you agree with?

Be specific if you can generate a few brain cells to come up with a response that didn't come off a truck stop shiotthouse wall..........

Another nut sucker response.......If the North pole is "moving" what's the South Pole doing?????????? IDIOT!!!!!!!!
As to your truck stop shyte house response, you see Boob, unlike you, I'm out on the road making money not chasing lot lizards at the local Flying J

The "magnetic" north pole has been shifting for decades.
When these same "hoaxers" were predicting the coming "ice age" in the 80's the "magnetic" north pole was doing the same thing!

Magnetic being the "Key" word!!!!

quote:

Originally posted by Jerry Mock:
Magnetic being the "Key" word!!!!

Why yes “Magnetic” is the key word.

Too bad BS Billy had to point it out for you Jerry, it was abundantly clear from your reply you had no clue, that was what was being discussed, the magnetic north pole movement, even after reading Bob’s post.

Well now let’s see, do you think you could explain exactly how, according to you, ”If the North Pole was "moving" we'd all be falling off of the planet”? That was you that said that was it not, Jerry?

Explain precisely how the position of the poles, north or otherwise, magnetic or rotational, or the movement of same, have anything to do with the “gravitational attraction” of the earth? Which is by the way what keeps us from, as you so colorfully put it, “falling off the planet”. I think you were having an “Are you smarter than a fifth grader moment”, when you wrote that Krap you posted, and by the way the fifth grader won this round.

You haven’t been reading the krap on the net from a while back that said we’d all go flying off the planet if the magnetic poles swapped polarity have you? Sounds like it to me.

By the way here is a preprint of the research article that is the basis of the information Bob was writing about.

Rapid ice melting drives Earth’s pole to the east
ftp://ftp.csr.utexas.edu/pub/g...L056164_preprint.pdf

Bob likely got his info here:
http://www.livescience.com/320...ing-melting-ice.html

So now Jerry, stop playing with your dipstick, no not the truck’s the other one, and maybe you could try an WTFU!

It seems your Oblamer nut sucking buddy Boob H didn't say magnetic now did he?????????? A Z Z Wipe
What do you expect from 2 birds of a feather????

Hey JM, guess we'd best bow to the smarter then thou duped boobs being scammed by the hoaxers!!!!!
Sadly for them they don't have the kahonies to step out into the real world and find the man-made global warming hoax has been TOTALLY debunked!!!!!
They're still clinging to a "hockey stick" theory that the creator of the theory has confessed was totally BULL SHYT!!!!!

quote:

Originally posted by Jerry Mock:
It seems your Oblamer nut sucking buddy Boob H didn't say magnetic now did he?????????? A Z Z Wipe
What do you expect from 2 birds of a feather????

With regard to Bob not specifying “magnetic” pole he shouldn’t have to, az zwipe. It is a given for this subject material and only further serves to highlight your own ignorance and cognitive deficiencies. I have to point out that the title of the source materials does not use “magnetic” either, it is simply understood, of course not by you. Maybe you should contact Dr. Chen the lead and corresponding author for the paper and explain the error him. You can find his contact info in the paper below.

“Rapid ice melting drives Earth’s pole to the east”
ftp://ftp.csr.utexas.edu/pub/g...L056164_preprint.pdf

I think in this instance in the first place, you might have been well served by adhering to the old saying, “Engage brain, before, putting mouth in gear”, but I suppose in your case there may be some inherent difficulties with that. Secondly, the old adage “the first thing one should do when one finds oneself in a deep hole, is to stop digging”.

Oh, and do get back with me on that whole gravity, magnetism, pole movement, falling off the face of the planet thing, as soon as you get that all figured out, OK? I’d really like to hear how you think that all works, I figure it should be pretty entertaining at the very least.

quote:

Originally posted by Bill Koski:
Hey JM, guess we'd best bow to the smarter then thou duped boobs being scammed by the hoaxers!!!!!
Sadly for them they don't have the kahonies to step out into the real world and find the man-made global warming hoax has been TOTALLY debunked!!!!!
They're still clinging to a "hockey stick" theory that the creator of the theory has confessed was totally BULL SHYT!!!!!

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Larry Heath,

FYI there are 2 North Poles...one geological and one magnetic! But in the duped boob imbiciles 3... you know the one where Santa Claus lives...after all you believe in Obama don't you

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Jerry Mock,

quote:

Originally posted by Jerry Mock:
FYI there are 2 North Poles...one geological and one magnetic!...

NFK Jerry, ...NFK!

But apparently you need to be specifically told, so as to know which one is being spoken about. Weren't you just whining that Bob didn't explain it, and, wasn't it BS Billy that had to point it out for you? Yeah, I am pretty sure it was.

That aside for now, come on Jerry, explain to everyone how we are all going to "fall off the planet" if any of them moves. I really would like to hear your explanation of how to nullify gravity on a planetary scale.

You just keep digging Jerry, I am sure you will get to the bottom of it yet.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Larry Heath,

Jerry, Hot Air has to be right, Al Gore said so.

Anchorage Sets New Record

232 days - it took over 30 years for Anchorage to set a new record for the longest snow season on record.

The National Weather Service measured 2/10ths of an inch just after 9 p.m. Friday and 1/10th Saturday morning - breaking the old record of 230 days set in 1981-1982.

for Longest Snow Season



Gpa

The hoaxers now confess there has not been any climate warming (once called man-made global warming) since 1998!!!!!
BUT they claim simply because they can not explain why the climate has not warmed in 15 years their long term prognostications are still "dead on with a zero!"
Fortunately for the hoaxers they have sycophants like a few that lurk here that eat this shyt up hook-line-an-sinker!!!!!

quote:

Originally posted by Bill Koski:
The hoaxers now confess there has not been any climate warming (once called man-made global warming) since 1998!!!!!
BUT they claim simply because they can not explain why the climate has not warmed in 15 years their long term prognostications are still "dead on with a zero!"
Fortunately for the hoaxers they have sycophants like a few that lurk here that eat this shyt up hook-line-an-sinker!!!!!

These duped boob IMBECILES all have the same response when they are backed into a corner with no rational response!!!!!
In fact this duped boob IMBECILE is rapidly approaching duped boob RETARD status!!!!!

quote:

Originally posted by Bill Koski:
These duped boob IMBECILES all have the same response when they are backed into a corner with no rational response!!!!!
In fact this duped boob IMBECILE is rapidly approaching duped boob RETARD status!!!!!

Science 17 May 2013:
Vol. 340 no. 6134 p. 798
DOI: 10.1126/science.340.6134.798

GLACIOLOGY

Melting Glaciers, Not Just Ice Sheets, Stoking Sea-Level Rise

Richard A. Kerr

Glaciologists trekking onto remote, inhospitable streams of flowing ice year after year, decade after decade, brought back some especially bad news early in the last decade. The world's glaciers have been shrinking frighteningly fast, so fast that their melting was pushing up sea level far faster than the shrinking ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica. But then 21st century monitoring from space began to show a much smaller role for glacial ice loss in sea-level rise. Which to believe?

A new study brings together both boots-on-the-ice and high-tech glaciologists. The study has found that, although the field measurements were painting an accurate picture of the few glaciers being monitored, they were not representative of the world's glaciers. All 19 glacierized regions of the world are losing ice, the study finds, but the iconic glaciers long-studied by field glaciologists are disappearing faster than most. Still, the world's glaciers are losing ice just as fast as the great ice sheets.

"I think there really was a consensus" among the diverse study authors, says J. Graham Cogley of Trent University in Peterborough, Canada, one of the 16 authors on the study. Even after he had spent 20 years compiling field observations that proved to be unrepresentative, Cogley thinks that the group managed to reconcile the conflicting estimates.

Science 17 May 2013:
Vol. 340 no. 6134 pp. 852-857
DOI: 10.1126/science.1234532

A Reconciled Estimate of Glacier Contributions to Sea Level Rise: 2003 to 2009

Alex S. Gardner1,2,*, Geir Moholdt3, J. Graham Cogley4, Bert Wouters5,6, Anthony A. Arendt7,
John Wahr5,8, Etienne Berthier9, Regine Hock7,10, W. Tad Pfeffer11, Georg Kaser12, Stefan R. M. Ligtenberg13, Tobias Bolch14,15, Martin J. Sharp16, Jon Ove Hagen17, Michiel R. van den Broeke13,
Frank Paul14

Glaciers distinct from the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets are losing large amounts of water to the world’s oceans. However, estimates of their contribution to sea level rise disagree. We provide a consensus estimate by standardizing existing, and creating new, mass-budget estimates from satellite gravimetry and altimetry and from local glaciological records. In many regions, local measurements are more negative than satellite-based estimates. All regions lost mass during 2003–2009, with the largest losses from Arctic Canada, Alaska, coastal Greenland, the southern Andes, and high-mountain Asia, but there was little loss from glaciers in Antarctica. Over this period, the global mass budget was –259 ± 28 gigatons per year, equivalent to the combined loss from both ice sheets and accounting for 29 ± 13% of the observed sea level rise.

As always anyone wishing to read the full text of these two papers, I will be happy to provide them with a copy.

"proved to be unrepresentative, Cogley thinks that the group managed to reconcile the conflicting estimates."
in other words , we really do not know WTF . but we think

A bunch of voodoo (scientists?), that are fat and sassy on the government dole, concoct a half-as$ed theory and then form a CONCENSUS that it is in deed a fact without an iota of scientific proof or documentation!!!!!