DragRaceResults.Com    Bracket Talk    Bracket Talk Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Politics and more Politics    Destroying the Church of Global Warming
Page 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 ... 207
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Destroying the Church of Global Warming
 Login/Join
 
DRR Pro
posted Hide Post
Some good reading

http://www.climatechange2013.o...pproved27Sep2013.pdf


Later Larry

Sapere aude!

"Put some jam on the bottom shelf where the little man can reach it."

"The Truth", it's just another liberal conspiracy!
 
Posts: 1275 | Location: Port Charlotte, Florida | Registered: December 16, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR All Star
posted Hide Post
E.5 Cryosphere

It is very likely that the Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin and that Northern
Hemisphere spring snow cover will decrease during the 21st century as global mean surface
temperature rises. Global glacier volume will further decrease. {12.4, 13.4}
• Year-round reductions in Arctic sea ice extent are projected by the end of the 21st century
from multi-model averages. These reductions range from 43% for RCP2.6 to 94% for RCP8.5
in September and from 8% for RCP2.6 to 34% for RCP8.5 in February (medium confidence)
(see Figures SPM.7 and SPM.8). {12.4}

• Based on an assessment of the subset of models that most closely reproduce the
climatological mean state and 1979‒2012 trend of the Arctic sea ice extent, a nearly ice-free
Arctic Ocean19 in September before mid-century is likely for RCP8.5 (medium confidence)
(see Figures SPM.7 and SPM.8). A projection of when the Arctic might become nearly ice-free
in September in the 21st century cannot be made with confidence for the other scenarios.
{11.3, 12.4, 12.5}

• In the Antarctic, a decrease in sea ice extent and volume is projected with low confidence for
the end of the 21st century as global mean surface temperature rises. {12.4}

• By the end of the 21st century, the global glacier volume, excluding glaciers on the periphery
of Antarctica, is projected to decrease by 15 to 55% for RCP2.6, and by 35 to 85% for RCP8.5
(medium confidence). {13.4, 13.5}

• The area of Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover is projected to decrease by 7% for
RCP2.6 and by 25% in RCP8.5 by the end of the 21st century for the model average (medium
confidence). {12.4}
 
Posts: 10253 | Location: Henderson, NV | Registered: December 09, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bob H:
Hi my name is Boob and I'm Larry's B-I-T-C-H QUOTE] Wave
 
Posts: 237 | Location: North Bend | Registered: February 06, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
posted Hide Post
quote:
By the end of the 21st century, the global glacier volume,.....

This nation is printing money just as fast as it can buy ink and we are $17 Trillion in debt, yet we are supposed to be concerned about the end of the century? Let's ground ourselves in reality and keep our eye on the ball!


Illegitimi non carborundum
 
Posts: 2385 | Location: OKC, OK | Registered: February 15, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Canted Valve:
quote:
By the end of the 21st century, the global glacier volume,.....

This nation is printing money just as fast as it can buy ink and we are $17 Trillion in debt, yet we are supposed to be concerned about the end of the century? Let's ground ourselves in reality and keep our eye on the ball!


CV...Its smoke and mirrors BABY!! Point out one thing while their other hand is in your pocket for one and keep your eyes off of the SCANDALS...oops did I say scandals ???????? Rolling


Jerry Mock
 
Posts: 2001 | Location: 2000 miles from the Village IDIOT and that's still to close! | Registered: September 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
posted Hide Post
Top MIT scientist: Newest UN climate report is ‘hilariously’ flawed

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/09...lawed/#ixzz2gKdqXEUo
 
Posts: 237 | Location: North Bend | Registered: February 06, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bob H:
E.5 Cryosphere

It is very likely that the Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin and that Northern
Hemisphere spring snow cover will decrease during the 21st century as global mean surface
temperature rises. Global glacier volume will further decrease. {12.4, 13.4}
• Year-round reductions in Arctic sea ice extent are projected by the end of the 21st century
from multi-model averages. These reductions range from 43% for RCP2.6 to 94% for RCP8.5
in September and from 8% for RCP2.6 to 34% for RCP8.5 in February (medium confidence)
(see Figures SPM.7 and SPM.8). {12.4}

• Based on an assessment of the subset of models that most closely reproduce the
climatological mean state and 1979‒2012 trend of the Arctic sea ice extent, a nearly ice-free
Arctic Ocean19 in September before mid-century is likely for RCP8.5 (medium confidence)
(see Figures SPM.7 and SPM.8). A projection of when the Arctic might become nearly ice-free
in September in the 21st century cannot be made with confidence for the other scenarios.
{11.3, 12.4, 12.5}

• In the Antarctic, a decrease in sea ice extent and volume is projected with low confidence for
the end of the 21st century as global mean surface temperature rises. {12.4}

• By the end of the 21st century, the global glacier volume, excluding glaciers on the periphery
of Antarctica, is projected to decrease by 15 to 55% for RCP2.6, and by 35 to 85% for RCP8.5
(medium confidence). {13.4, 13.5}

• The area of Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover is projected to decrease by 7% for
RCP2.6 and by 25% in RCP8.5 by the end of the 21st century for the model average (medium
confidence). {12.4}


Damn stuff melts all summer long and refreezes in the winter...damn seasons/weather anyway Rolling


Jerry Mock
 
Posts: 2001 | Location: 2000 miles from the Village IDIOT and that's still to close! | Registered: September 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post



DRR Pro
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Koski:
In the un propaganda report the HOAXERS completely ignored the fact there has not been any warming in 15 years!!!!!
They wouldn't want the hoaxees to possibly glom onto that fact from the report because even if they stumbled across it previously somewhere with the hoaxees lack of reading comprehension and retention they have still remained HOAXEES!!!!!


Many scientists across the world and over decades of time with repeated and continued study of the environment, using multitudes of different forms of data and processes, some data stretching back 800,000 years have come to the conclusion that AGW is occurring.

But BS Billy and a hand full posting here, say it’s a hoax.

Who are we to believe?

The world of science, the same people who are capable of building and sending semi-autonomous machines to other planets, requiring numerous advanced skills and physical measurements and devices so precise as to be almost incomprehensible to most people. The same scientists that designed and help place in orbit around the planet a constellation of GPS satellites that allows one to know their location to within a few centimeters anywhere in the near vicinity of earth, this requiring the synchronization and measurement of time to plus or minus 10 Nano seconds (10^-9), and that is akin to measuring with a yardstick and marking with chalk, compared, to the latest optical clocks that these same scientist have produced that are capable of accurately measuring time in Atto second (10^-18) time increments or better. Put a different way if a clock of this type were started running at the beginning of the universe it would have a cumulative error of about 43 second today, 13.85 billion years later.

Or, Billy and his Russian emails and a hand full of internet sites that he is loath to provide links to and likely some who would say the world/universe is only 6000 year old.

The world of science, the same people who study the subatomic world and build vast and extraordinarily complex machines of enormous power, able to peer inside incomprehensibly small objects that live incomprehensibly short lives to determine the most fundamental nature of the universe, this to once again prove well beyond the most remote shadow of doubt and to an unprecedentedly precise level accuracy the Standard Model of physics. This occurring recently at CERN in the discovery of the long sought Higgs particle.

Or, Billy and his “Real scientist” that say the rest of the scientific community can’t even measure temperature accurately.

The world of science, the same people capable of determining the age of the universe, to unprecedentedly narrow margin of error, or capable of measuring the cosmic microwave background temperature (the lingering sound of the Big Bang) to precisions undreamt of only a few decades ago, or to work out much of physics back to a time only infinitesimally (10^-35 second) after the universe itself came into existence, 13.85 billion years ago.

Or, Billy and his “Real scientist” that say that science doesn’t understand the physics of how CO2 captures energy from the sun, or the energy output of the Sun which his “Real Scientists” say supposedly can’t reliably be measure, either.

So, who would I choose to believe, the group of scientists who as the saying goes, stands on the shoulders of giants, and who as a group contain a disproportionately large number of the greatest minds humanity has ever known.

Or, Billy and his “Real scientists” as well as few slack jawed leg humping sh1t flingers posting in a place that can only be described as the arshole of the internet.

So who do you believe, all of the people engaged in science or some ranting old fool whose greatest mental achievement in all of his life allowed him to work on a GM assembly line and win a few drag races?

I will take science, over this ranting old fool and his know nothing simpleton cohort, every damn time!


Later Larry

Sapere aude!

"Put some jam on the bottom shelf where the little man can reach it."

"The Truth", it's just another liberal conspiracy!
 
Posts: 1275 | Location: Port Charlotte, Florida | Registered: December 16, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR All Star
posted Hide Post
quote:
I will take science, over this ranting old fool and his know nothing simpleton cohort, every damn time!



Amen....and you can take that to the bank!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Posts: 10253 | Location: Henderson, NV | Registered: December 09, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
posted Hide Post
SoSDD...ZEROOOOOOOOOoooo


Jerry Mock
 
Posts: 2001 | Location: 2000 miles from the Village IDIOT and that's still to close! | Registered: September 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR All Star
posted Hide Post
WASHINGTON (AP) — Starting in about a decade, Kingston, Jamaica, will probably be off-the-charts hot — permanently. Other places will soon follow. Singapore in 2028. Mexico City in 2031. Cairo in 2036. Phoenix and Honolulu in 2043.

And eventually the whole world in 2047.

A new study on global warming pinpoints the probable dates for when cities and ecosystems around the world will regularly experience hotter environments the likes of which they have never seen before.

And for dozens of cities, mostly in the tropics, those dates are a generation or less away.

"This paper is both innovative and sobering," said Oregon State University professor Jane Lubchenco, former head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, who was not involved in the study.

To arrive at their projections, the researchers used weather observations, computer models and other data to calculate the point at which every year from then on will be warmer than the hottest year ever recorded over the last 150 years.

For example, the world as a whole had its hottest year on record in 2005. The new study, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, says that by the year 2047, every year that follows will probably be hotter than that record-setting scorcher.

Eventually, the coldest year in a particular city or region will be hotter than the hottest year in its past.

Study author Camilo Mora and his colleagues said they hope this new way of looking at climate change will spur governments to do something before it is too late.

"Now is the time to act," said another study co-author, Ryan Longman.


Mora, a biological geographer at the University of Hawaii, and colleagues ran simulations from 39 different computer models and looked at hundreds of thousands of species, maps and data points to ask when places will have "an environment like we had never seen before."

The 2047 date for the whole world is based on continually increasing emissions of greenhouse gases from the burning of coal, oil and natural gases. If the world manages to reduce its emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases, that would be pushed to as late as 2069, according to Mora.

But for now, Mora said, the world is rushing toward the 2047 date.

"One can think of this year as a kind of threshold into a hot new world from which one never goes back," said Carnegie Institution climate scientist Chris Field, who was not part of the study. "This is really dramatic."

Mora forecasts that the unprecedented heat starts in 2020 with Manokwa, Indonesia. Then Kingston, Jamaica. Within the next two decades, 59 cities will be living in what is essentially a new climate, including Singapore, Havana, Kuala Lumpur and Mexico City.

By 2043, 147 cities — more than half of those studied — will have shifted to a hotter temperature regime that is beyond historical records.

The first U.S. cities to feel that would be Honolulu and Phoenix, followed by San Diego and Orlando, Fla., in 2046. New York and Washington will get new climates around 2047, with Los Angeles, Detroit, Houston, Chicago, Seattle, Austin and Dallas a bit later.

Mora calculated that the last of the 265 cities to move into their new climate will be Anchorage, Alaska — in 2071. There's a five-year margin of error on the estimates.

Unlike previous research, the study highlights the tropics more than the polar regions. In the tropics, temperatures don't vary much, so a small increase can have large effects on ecosystems, he said. A 3-degree change is not much to polar regions but is dramatic in the tropics, which hold most of the Earth's biodiversity, he said.

The Mora team found that by one measurement — ocean acidity — Earth has already crossed the threshold into an entirely new regime. That happened in about 2008, with every year since then more acidic than the old record, according to study co-author Abby Frazier.

Of the species studied, coral reefs will be the first stuck in a new climate — around 2030 — and are most vulnerable to climate change, Mora said.

Judith Curry, a Georgia Institute of Technology climate scientist who often clashes with mainstream scientists, said she found Mora's approach to make more sense than the massive report that came out of the U.N.-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change last month.

Pennsylvania State University climate scientist Michael Mann said the research "may actually be presenting an overly rosy scenario when it comes to how close we are to passing the threshold for dangerous climate impacts."

"By some measures, we are already there," he said.
 
Posts: 10253 | Location: Henderson, NV | Registered: December 09, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR All Star
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Koski:
duped boob RETARD #1 is now zeroing his own posts!!!!!

In the un propaganda report the HOAXERS completely ignored the fact there has not been any warming in 15 years!!!!!
They wouldn't want the hoaxees to possibly glom onto that fact from the report because even if they stumbled across it previously somewhere with the hoaxees lack of reading comprehension and retention they have still remained HOAXEES!!!!!

One other item to consider is the FACT that the HOAXERS have been moving, or not moving, instruments to get the HIGHEST BOGUS readings possible!!!!!
If they hadn't resorted to this chicanery what would the REAL RESULTS look like?????




What the fawk you talking about old man????????

Mary said you are nuts...............
 
Posts: 10253 | Location: Henderson, NV | Registered: December 09, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Elite
Picture of Bill Koski
posted Hide Post
HEY, HEY, HEY, three cheers for bj, he finally figured out how to delete a post!!!!!
Now maybe he will delete all of the stupid bull shyt he has posted?????

In the un propaganda report the HOAXERS completely ignored the fact there has not been any warming in 15 years!!!!!
They wouldn't want the hoaxees to possibly glom onto that fact from the report because even if they stumbled across it previously somewhere with the hoaxees lack of reading comprehension and retention they have still remained HOAXEES!!!!!

One other item to consider is the FACT that the HOAXERS have been moving, or not moving, instruments to get the HIGHEST BOGUS readings possible!!!!!
If they hadn't resorted to this chicanery what would the REAL RESULTS look like?????


TAKE IT TO THE BANK!!!!!
Later, Bill Koski
 
Posts: 11035 | Location: LAS VEGAS. NEVADA, US of A | Registered: December 03, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bob H:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Koski:
duped boob RETARD #1 is now zeroing his own posts!!!!!

In the un propaganda report the HOAXERS completely ignored the fact there has not been any warming in 15 years!!!!!
They wouldn't want the hoaxees to possibly glom onto that fact from the report because even if they stumbled across it previously somewhere with the hoaxees lack of reading comprehension and retention they have still remained HOAXEES!!!!!

One other item to consider is the FACT that the HOAXERS have been moving, or not moving, instruments to get the HIGHEST BOGUS readings possible!!!!!
If they hadn't resorted to this chicanery what would the REAL RESULTS look like?????




What the fawk you talking about old man????????

Mary said you are nuts...............


SoSDD ZEROOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooo


Jerry Mock
 
Posts: 2001 | Location: 2000 miles from the Village IDIOT and that's still to close! | Registered: September 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post



DRR Top Comp
posted Hide Post

quote:
Originally posted by Bob H:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Starting in about a decade, Kingston, Jamaica, will probably be off-the-charts hot — permanently. Other places will soon follow. Singapore in 2028. Mexico City in 2031. Cairo in 2036. Phoenix and Honolulu in 2043.

And eventually the whole world in 2047.

A new study on global warming pinpoints the probable dates for when cities and ecosystems around the world will regularly experience hotter environments the likes of which they have never seen before.

And for dozens of cities, mostly in the tropics, those dates are a generation or less away.

"This paper is both innovative and sobering," said Oregon State University professor Jane Lubchenco, former head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, who was not involved in the study.

To arrive at their projections, the researchers used weather observations, computer models and other data to calculate the point at which every year from then on will be warmer than the hottest year ever recorded over the last 150 years.

For example, the world as a whole had its hottest year on record in 2005. The new study, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, says that by the year 2047, every year that follows will probably be hotter than that record-setting scorcher.

Eventually, the coldest year in a particular city or region will be hotter than the hottest year in its past.

Study author Camilo Mora and his colleagues said they hope this new way of looking at climate change will spur governments to do something before it is too late.

"Now is the time to act," said another study co-author, Ryan Longman.


Mora, a biological geographer at the University of Hawaii, and colleagues ran simulations from 39 different computer models and looked at hundreds of thousands of species, maps and data points to ask when places will have "an environment like we had never seen before."

The 2047 date for the whole world is based on continually increasing emissions of greenhouse gases from the burning of coal, oil and natural gases. If the world manages to reduce its emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases, that would be pushed to as late as 2069, according to Mora.

But for now, Mora said, the world is rushing toward the 2047 date.

"One can think of this year as a kind of threshold into a hot new world from which one never goes back," said Carnegie Institution climate scientist Chris Field, who was not part of the study. "This is really dramatic."

Mora forecasts that the unprecedented heat starts in 2020 with Manokwa, Indonesia. Then Kingston, Jamaica. Within the next two decades, 59 cities will be living in what is essentially a new climate, including Singapore, Havana, Kuala Lumpur and Mexico City.

By 2043, 147 cities — more than half of those studied — will have shifted to a hotter temperature regime that is beyond historical records.

The first U.S. cities to feel that would be Honolulu and Phoenix, followed by San Diego and Orlando, Fla., in 2046. New York and Washington will get new climates around 2047, with Los Angeles, Detroit, Houston, Chicago, Seattle, Austin and Dallas a bit later.

Mora calculated that the last of the 265 cities to move into their new climate will be Anchorage, Alaska — in 2071. There's a five-year margin of error on the estimates.

Unlike previous research, the study highlights the tropics more than the polar regions. In the tropics, temperatures don't vary much, so a small increase can have large effects on ecosystems, he said. A 3-degree change is not much to polar regions but is dramatic in the tropics, which hold most of the Earth's biodiversity, he said.

The Mora team found that by one measurement — ocean acidity — Earth has already crossed the threshold into an entirely new regime. That happened in about 2008, with every year since then more acidic than the old record, according to study co-author Abby Frazier.

Of the species studied, coral reefs will be the first stuck in a new climate — around 2030 — and are most vulnerable to climate change, Mora said.

Judith Curry, a Georgia Institute of Technology climate scientist who often clashes with mainstream scientists, said she found Mora's approach to make more sense than the massive report that came out of the U.N.-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change last month.

Pennsylvania State University climate scientist Michael Mann said the research "may actually be presenting an overly rosy scenario when it comes to how close we are to passing the threshold for dangerous climate impacts."

"By some measures, we are already there," he said.


Gpa
 
Posts: 8726 | Location: Blythe GA USA | Registered: January 31, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Elite
Picture of Bill Koski
posted Hide Post
Every single computer model these HOAXERS have dreamed up so far has blown up in their faces!!!!!
Like the rapist said, "stupidity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result!!!!!"


TAKE IT TO THE BANK!!!!!
Later, Bill Koski
 
Posts: 11035 | Location: LAS VEGAS. NEVADA, US of A | Registered: December 03, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
posted Hide Post
quote:
A new study on global warming pinpoints the probable dates for when cities and ecosystems around the world will regularly experience hotter environments the likes of which they have never seen before.

Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle. Only problem is these clowns are only about three steps behind. This little sham has already been played out by the return of Jesus/Armageddon bunch, without success, many many times. And the bible is cast in stone, no need for a computer game, er model. Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.


Illegitimi non carborundum
 
Posts: 2385 | Location: OKC, OK | Registered: February 15, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
posted Hide Post
Hey Hoaxie


http://finance.townhall.com/co...bal-warming-n1694740

This message has been edited. Last edited by: I.P. Dailey,
 
Posts: 654 | Location: Here | Registered: November 15, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
posted Hide Post
On Monday, I had a friend up in Williston ND say they produced a record 990,000 barrels of oil in ONE day! He said they're "Just getting started!!!"


Jerry Mock
 
Posts: 2001 | Location: 2000 miles from the Village IDIOT and that's still to close! | Registered: September 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Elite
Picture of Bill Koski
posted Hide Post
All that oil is coming from private property, if it was government property it would be OFF LIMITS!!!!!
Did you see the program Larry, git-er-done, did from Williston?
I was there in 2004 and it was pretty much just a wide spot on the road!!!!!


TAKE IT TO THE BANK!!!!!
Later, Bill Koski
 
Posts: 11035 | Location: LAS VEGAS. NEVADA, US of A | Registered: December 03, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 ... 207 
 

DragRaceResults.Com    Bracket Talk    Bracket Talk Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Politics and more Politics    Destroying the Church of Global Warming

© DragRaceResults.com 2024