the best 2 inch 4500 carb spacer for a 565 bracket engine.

no such spacer and 2" is 2" too much.

pick your preferred material, color, configuration(4 hole, blended. tapered or open) and buy it because none of them are worth anything on the time slip.

Been there done that on several engines with HP that varied from 500 to 1100 and ain't ever seen .01 in ET or .1 MPH

quote:

the best 2 inch 4500 carb spacer for a 565 bracket engine.

Look at the big ticket sportsman engine builders with their closest offering to yours. There's your answer.

Call David Hughes at HRE intakes manifolds. I have used lots of spacer combinations over the years and they always made more power than anything else on the dyno.

quote:

Originally posted by Zip Tie:
the best 2 inch 4500 carb spacer for a 565 bracket engine.

Reher Morrison 1 3/4 two piece sheer plate
and anti - reversion plate.

They're fast and good Super Pro bracket, won 7 Super Pro championships in 10 years running 4150 and 4500.

Went 1.27 60 ft N/A sbc 3250 lbs 10 x 28 tire, dipped in the 5's all steel Nova using one.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Mike Rietow,

N/A I wouldn't attempt to run an intake with this much plenum without a Reher Morrison sheer anti - reversion plate.

wouldn't run any intake with that much plenum on a heavy, n/a door car and I didn't on the N/A 23 sbc with out of the box All Pro 220's in this all steel Camaro W/ triple chrome plated steel bumpers, factory glass at 3250 lbs on a 10 x 30 radial tire with a 2 speed powerglide that goes 1.27 60ft off the footbrake and runs low 6's N/A, with a 4150 carb, 10" converter, mufflers and has never hit a timing block.

quote:

Originally posted by Duane1791:
Call David Hughes at HRE intakes manifolds. I have used lots of spacer combinations over the years and they always made more power than anything else on the dyno.

couldn't care any less how much more power it made on a dyno, what it won't do is ET quicker or run faster.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: 1320racer,

quote:

Originally posted by 1320racer:
no such spacer and 2" is 2" too much.

pick your preferred material, color, configuration(4 hole, blended. tapered or open) and buy it because none of them are worth anything on the time slip.

Been there done that on several engines with HP that varied from 500 to 1100 and ain't ever seen .01 in ET or .1 MPH

with 1290 on this. I have seen no et or mph gain with or with out snazzy spacers. runs the same as if my stop was under the carb.

ep-what? me and 1290 agree on something again

I will add this, carb spacers can help make more power, this is a fact! Which one depends on a number of factors. Will they give you 30 HP more, nope! SO you need to look at it this way, one little thing won't move the needle much but start adding the little things up and they will!

Some engines like them, some don't, very combo specific. Will they make a difference on the track? Doubt it......

I've ran them, but only to gain clearance for throttle linkages and such....

Al your fact never proves to be true on the time slip where is matters.

1. Small tire Ed. 2. 1.27 60 ft Ed. 3. Triple chrome plated steel bumpers Ed. 4. 3250 lbs Ed.
5. You're like Bradenton stealing valor with no evidence Ed. Liberals are looters Ed.

we get it. small tire. small block. runs good. fast 60 ft. chrome bumpers. (which look nice by the way).

1290 had small tire. fast 60. run good. nice bumpers.

ep

quote:

Originally posted by pauley:
we get it. small tire. small block. runs good. fast 60 ft. chrome bumpers. (which look nice by the way).

1290 had small tire. fast 60. run good. nice bumpers.

ep

Thank you, If I suggest a part, I try to evidence it's performance. I evidence the parts performance, to evidence I'm impartial in regards to its manufacture. I don't work for Reher Morrison, it's a good part or I wouldn't suggest or run it.

You see a lot of suggestions, without any evidence of performance. I try to evidence everything I communicate for those who still use objectivity to come to rational conclusions, rather than opinion.

Mike Rhodes Camaro 1968? just went 4.35 on 275/60 tire at 166 mph. Some power adder I am sure. SBC too. He broke all kinds of records.

quote:

Originally posted by 1320racer:
Al your fact never proves to be true on the time slip where is matters.

Ed, without getting into a great debate, did you read what I said?

BTW you guys coming to NED this weekend?

I did and of course we are.

Meanwhile, Mikey, gets himself all worked up about his nothing special 1.27 60 foot with a 3200 lb. car. Well if 60 foots are your thing then this 3880 lb. ALL steel car with triple chrome plated bumpers, full factory interior including the staple shifter, tilt wheel, heater, defroster, power steering, power brakes...



hell it even had a good for nothing carb spacer




60 foots are astounding with a 1.28 best, launched of the footbrake on 30 x 10 tires and also running through the muffler...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbKYio6OvKM

This message has been edited. Last edited by: 1320racer,

I would be very interested to see that Camaro Ed is talking about try an RPM airgap intake.

it has had several manifolds over many years depending on the engine combo, including the RPM air gap but not with its current 400 sbc engine

Every body is putting the turtle in them. If its that good should have been in there from the manufacturer. My SBC car lost almost 3 tenths fro RPM to Super Victor. Should have tried the turtle in there.