Yeah, try to talk real big like you're actually a man of some sort. You weasel.
You posted a news clip about our military's actions in Afghanistan ONLY BECAUSE OF THE LAST SENTENCE IN THE CLIP.
You obviously could give a shyt about the rest of it.
You have no problems using our guys to try and make bama look better. Your real cheap shot was doing it on Memorial Day.

My "guy" didn't lose or win. And if you had half a brain, or could think for yourself with what little gray matter you do have, you'd understand NOBODIES "guy" won.
I know you're just one of the sheep that believes you're being taken care of in Washington and I could care less about that. As a matter of fact I think a fool like you deserves everything you get.

Quit being a worm and own up to what you did. Or be the b!tch you are and keep acting innocent. Just don't try to blow smoke up my a$$ when it's posted in black and white.

Again I apologize to all pieces of dog shyt for associating them with you.


.

To think boobh put ME on ignore once because I was hard on him for his lying and weaselly ways??????????

How you ever pulled the horse****t you posted out of my copied news release just proves how ignorant you are, matter of fact, right up there with barking dog!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



You are in good company with the way your pea sized brain works.

Barking Dog once referred Cali as the land of "Fruits and Nuts".
Which 1 are you? I suspect "BOTH"....

At 1 time barking dog left DRR for a spell because he couldn't take the heat for his posted lies and BS.

Go fabricate some more BS, mr. tough guy sitting behind a keyboard.....

Eat some more wheaties and post some more spin...........

You are a joke when it comes to reading comprehension......

quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:

quote:

Hypocrisy is mind boggling.

TL, did you not support drone attacks while bush was in office relating to Afghanistan??????

Why the switch?

Yes, i guess it is............

I'm just pointing out you and Jeremy's hypocrisy.

Bush torturing the mastermind behind 9/11 bad, Obama killing a terrorist along with his wife, daughters and grandchild makes him a hero?

Why aren't you and Jeremy asking if this is constitutional?

Why isn't Jeremy calling Obama a neocon?

quote:

Originally posted by Trans Lady:

quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:

quote:

Hypocrisy is mind boggling.

TL, did you not support drone attacks while bush was in office relating to Afghanistan??????

Why the switch?

Yes, i guess it is............

I'm just pointing out you and Jeremy's hypocrisy.

Bush torturing the mastermind behind 9/11 bad, Obama killing a terrorist along with his wife, daughters and grandchild makes him a hero?

Why aren't you and Jeremy asking if this is constitutional?

Why isn't Jeremy calling Obama a neocon?

The wh0le fawking war is unconstitutional.

The fact you supported bush's killings of over 100,000 ppl and now you complain when the war keeps on killing makes you a hypocrite.

Maybe they should waterboard you for not answering a direct question if you are a cuban.


So, by your reply bush did use torture in your eyes when it was not needed?
What they learned during the torture was the same info he spewed before the torture.

Is it Constitutional to use torture on anybody?


.......makes him a hero?

Who has said Obama is a hero?
Please be specific with facts and don't be overcome by the BS that is posted.

quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:

quote:

Originally posted by Trans Lady:

quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:

quote:

Hypocrisy is mind boggling.

TL, did you not support drone attacks while bush was in office relating to Afghanistan??????

Why the switch?

Yes, i guess it is............

I'm just pointing out you and Jeremy's hypocrisy.

Bush torturing the mastermind behind 9/11 bad, Obama killing a terrorist along with his wife, daughters and grandchild makes him a hero?

Why aren't you and Jeremy asking if this is constitutional?

Why isn't Jeremy calling Obama a neocon?

.......makes him a hero?

Who has said Obama is a hero?
Please be specific with facts and don't be overcome by the BS that is posted.

Bob, this isn't about me. So, don't change the subject.

Why did you posted the killing of Mustafa Abu al-Yazid under Obama?

Even the new neocon Jeremy seen you " using it to credit him."

I answered your question from your posting.
When i asked you a question, you accuse me of changing the subject.



You are trying to connect the dots between hero and Obama.

Why Marie,.....why when nobody else has?????????

quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:


You are trying to connect the dots between hero and Obama.

Why Marie,.....why when nobody else has?????????

Not true!

As I mentioned that neocon Jeremy said you were giving Obama "credit" which means honor.

quote:

Originally posted by Trans Lady:


Bob, this isn't about me. So, don't change the subject.

Why did you posted the killing of Mustafa Abu al-Yazid under Obama?

Even the new neocon Jeremy seen you " using it to credit him."

I didn't say Bob was crediting him, I said somebody was discrediting him as much as that same person implied that Bob was crediting him. Either way, is it wrong to give credit where credit might be due? Considering 95% of the posts on here are negative comments from people who would rather see the country fail than to see a democratic president succeed.

As far as the hypocrisy you mentioned, rarely do I talk about the war and Bush. In fact, the only time I have mentioned Bush lately is when I focus on the fact that you all will blame any other president other than Bush for current and past failures out of spite. i.e. Clinton and 9/11, Obama and the economy, Dem congress and gas prices...... because to you all Bush was an angel and did nothing wrong. If anything, when I talk about Bush and the war, I bring up the destruction of the economy before I mention war crimes.

I'm a neocon? You might want to look the definition. Neoconservatism represents people like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Condi....... are you implying I am supporters of all them?

This is me?

Neoconservatism is a right-wing political philosophy that emerged in the United States of America, and which supports using American economic and military power to bring liberalism, democracy, and human rights to other countries.[1][2][3] Consequently the term is chiefly applicable to certain Americans and their strong supporters. In economics, unlike paleoconservatives and libertarians, neoconservatives are generally comfortable with a welfare state; and, while rhetorically supportive of free markets, they are willing to interfere for overriding social purposes.

quote:

Considering 95% of the posts on here are negative comments from people who would rather see the country fail than to see a democratic president succeed.

Err taggy, he is creating the negative comments because he is the one failing this country. From day one in office he has turned this country back 20 years. It has always been his way or the highway. And the cronies Reid, Pelosi, Old Larry, BH, BD, announcer have bought into his ways..Get a fking job and stop living off the real workers will you..

Like I said........

"stoner" went to Pittsburg today to read some more bullshyt from his teleprompter and the only socialist donkey that would be seen with him was the mayor, he must not have an election coming up any time soon!
The rest of the area socialist donkies absolutely refused to be associated with the loser!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
More bad news for "stoner", the bogus news guy on comedy central and even tingly leg matthews have turned on poor 'ole "stoner" BIG TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

quote:

Originally posted by Jeremy J.:

quote:

Originally posted by Trans Lady:


Bob, this isn't about me. So, don't change the subject.

Why did you posted the killing of Mustafa Abu al-Yazid under Obama?

Even the new neocon Jeremy seen you " using it to credit him."

I didn't say Bob was crediting him, I said somebody was discrediting him as much as that same person implied that Bob was crediting him. Either way, is it wrong to give credit where credit might be due? Considering 95% of the posts on here are negative comments from people who would rather see the country fail than to see a democratic president succeed.

As far as the hypocrisy you mentioned, rarely do I talk about the war and Bush. In fact, the only time I have mentioned Bush lately is when I focus on the fact that you all will blame any other president other than Bush for current and past failures out of spite. i.e. Clinton and 9/11, Obama and the economy, Dem congress and gas prices...... because to you all Bush was an angel and did nothing wrong. If anything, when I talk about Bush and the war, I bring up the destruction of the economy before I mention war crimes.

I'm a neocon? You might want to look the definition. Neoconservatism represents people like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Condi....... are you implying I am supporters of all them?

No, nothing wrong with giving credit where credit is due. Did either of you give Bush credit for getting the mastermind behind 9/11? No, of course not. You and Bob feel Bush is a war crimal for hurting the POS. I guess he should have taken Obama's policy of just blowing them up, and if women and children are around so be it. And hey Obama doesn't have to worry about where to put them.

You're concern about the destruction of the economy from Bush's war and not Obama's war?

How do you feel about him staying in Iraq.....

Notice from the President on the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to the Stabalization of Iraq

On May 22, 2003, by Executive Order 13303, the President declared a national emergency protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and certain other property in which Iraq has an interest, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 1706). The President took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq.

In Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13438 of July 17, 2007, the President modified the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and took additional steps in response to this national emergency.

Because the obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303, as modified in scope and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Orders 13315, 13350, 13364, and 13438, must continue in effect beyond May 22, 2010. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the stabilization of Iraq.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
May 12, 2010.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-...t-stabilization-iraq

Or how about Obama's partnership with Mexico...

May 30, 2010

President Obama and President Calderon met in Washington on May 19, in the second state visit since President Obama took office. The pageantry and festivity of the state visit was fitting for two great countries with deep historical traditions and rich cultures. The visit also set an agenda that will create more jobs in both countries, develop new markets for renewable energy, control the menace of organized crime, and continue to reinforce the bonds between the people of Mexico and the United States.

http://mexico.usembassy.gov/en...rship_Universal.html

As far as neocon, using your train of thought, you are more of a neocon than anyone on here. After all they are ex-socialist democrats.

You and Bob's hypocrisy never fails to amaze me.

Somebody needs to learn their political ideologies.

+

quote:

Originally posted by Jeremy J.:
Somebody needs to learn their political ideologies.

Well read on........

"New" conservatives initially approached this view from the political left. The forerunners of neoconservatism were most often socialists or sometimes liberals who strongly supported the Allied cause in World War II, and who were influenced by the Great Depression-era ideas of the New Deal, trade unionism, and Trotskyism, particularly those who followed the political ideas of Max Shachtman.[citation needed] A number of future neoconservatives, such as Jeane Kirkpatrick,[citation needed] were Shachtmanites in their youth; some were later involved with Social Democrats USA.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism

You can't be serious. This is me?

A neoconservative (also spelled "neo-conservative"; colloquially, neocon) in American politics is someone presented as a conservative but who actually favors big government, interventionalism, and a hostility to religion in politics and government. The word means "newly conservative," and thus formerly liberal. Many neocons had been liberals in their youth and admired President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Neoconservatives tend to oppose the appointment of social conservatives to high governmental positions, such as nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. Neoconservatives support candidates who are liberal on social issues instead.

The defining position of a neoconservative is advocacy of an American foreign policy that seeks to install democracy in other nations. That reflects both their emphasis on foreign policy and their downplaying the significance of the differences in cultures and religion around the globe. The neoconservative position was discredited in the failure of democracy in the Iranian elections of 2009.

The neoconservative movement emerged in the mid 1970s, played a limited role in the Ronald Reagan Administration, and then had a voice in the Defense Department under the George W. Bush Administration after 2001.

Neoconservatives are often preferred by liberals to portray the conservative voice in the media, as in television talk shows, newspaper columnists, magazines, think tanks, and advisory positions in Republican Administrations. Irving Kristol and Leo Strauss were the major founders of the movement.

Some prominent spokesmen include Bill Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis Libby, Norman Podhoretz, Daniel Pipes, Charles Krauthammer, Richard Perle, Robert Kagan, Christopher Hitchens, Stephen Schwartz, Elliott Abrams, Ben Wattenberg and Carl Gershman.

In contrast to traditional conservatives, neoconservatives favor globalism, downplay religious issues and differences, are unlikely to actively oppose abortion and homosexuality. Neocons disagree with conservatives on issues such as classroom prayer, the separation of powers, cultural unity, and immigration. Neocons favor a strong active state in world affairs. Neocons oppose affirmative action with greater emphasis and priority than other conservatives do.

On foreign policy, neoconservatives believe that democracy can and should be installed by the United States around the world, even in Muslim countries such as Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia.

Neoconservatives did not dominate the George W. Bush administration but did support its foreign policy, and especially favored the Iraq War and its efforts to spread democracy worldwide. Neoconservatives also favor military action against Iran.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Neoconservatism

quote:

. Neoconservatives support candidates who are liberal on social issues

Sounds like Crist and you support him.

I'll give you some time to sober up a little bit.

quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:
How you ever pulled the horse****t you posted out of my copied news release just proves how ignorant you are, matter of fact, right up there with barking dog!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



You are in good company with the way your pea sized brain works.

Barking Dog once referred Cali as the land of "Fruits and Nuts".
Which 1 are you? I suspect "BOTH"....

At 1 time barking dog left DRR for a spell because he couldn't take the heat for his posted lies and BS.

Go fabricate some more BS, mr. tough guy sitting behind a keyboard.....

Eat some more wheaties and post some more spin...........

You are a joke when it comes to reading comprehension......

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE F U C K ING KIDDING ME. BOOB, THESE ARE THE EXACT STATEMETNS THAT EVERYONE STATES ABOUT YOU. YOU TALK ABOUT A PES SIZED BRAIN WE CAN GO BACK TO THE QUESTIONS AND LETS SEE IF YOU ANSWER THEM. yOU HAVE TO BE THE STUPIDIEST MORON ON THIS SITE. IF IT ISN'T FED TO YOU FROM OBAMERS NUTS OR A ZZ YOU CAN'T GET IT. BUT ON OCCASSION, I HAVE ACTUALLY SEEN YOU FABRICATE SOMETHING YOURSELF BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T BEEN FED ENOUGH BS OR YOUR POINTS HAVE BEEN BLOWN OUT OF THE WATER SO MANY TIMES.

BUT JUST FOR MEMORIES SAKE:
Did you serve in the military?
Did you serve your country?
Have you ever done any thing that has contributed to the saving of anything valuable to this country?
Have you ever done anything patriotic?
Explain to us how educated you are Boob?
Tell us about your education?
Tell us about your schooling?
Tell us about your achievements?
Tell us about any company you have helped that is successful now.
Show us how you have specifically contributed to the betterment of this country.