quote:

Originally posted by Bob H: No, you read the book instead of relying on anothers post.
Obama has never confessed to "Rampant drug use".
Whopper is a liar and can't stand on his own 2 feet and ppl like you keep scratching his back.

Typical for a flock of sheep.

I did read the book a couple years ago. If you're memory wasn't so shiitey you might remember me discussing parts of it in the past.

And I took from it the same as Koski, that Obama was a heavy drug user in his younger days!

quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:
Duck tape beard, just another sheep in the flock.


What a joke. lol

Bob..Taking it like a good little liberal

LMAO

Dave

Now that's nasty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0boy now admits he made a mistake nominating t. dashole, why wasn't it a mistake to nominate the Treasury Secretary whose tax cheating was more flagrant then dashole's??????????????????
At least dashole could half-way lie and say he didn't realize he owed them but the other doofus was told he owed the taxes and was given a check to pay them with!!!!!!!!!!!!!

quote:

He is SO LIBERAL till it is down right scarey

He tried his best not to act like it through the elections but unfortunately too many people wanted "change"....

Now it turns out 0boy's Republican Commerce Secretary nominee is dirty, he was providing legislative favors for one of the evil abramoff's guys in turn for payola, YES the same abramoff that loaded dingy harry up with graft!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No way he would have been named if he was pure as the wind driven snow!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Note to self: Add "Pure Politician" to list of oxymorons.

reckin how many more of big o,s boys are felons looking for a conviction .

The monkeys are finishing up the warm-ups and are ready to get into the main act!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oboys approval ratings are down twenty (20) points in two (2) weeks, where will he be in another month??????????????
The prokeria is losing support daily and 0boy is getting more and more shrill with his whiny lying about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The kids insurance bill passed and something for you people Making $30.00 an hour with no OT to ponder as your descendents future is mortgaged by 0boy and the socialist donkies. You will now be paying the 27 year old professional student down the streets medical insurance since the worms father only makes $5.00 an hour more then you do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just ran across this...I LMAO..Glen Beck

Dave

Someone has to explain to me how these FOB (friends of Bobs) get away with this..No wonder the country is going broke 54% of the country must not have paid their taxes

# 5?

Dave

It's becoming clearer and clearer why the socialist donkies are so anxious to raise the tax rates, THEY DON'T PAY THEIR TAXES AND WHEN THEY'RE BUSTED IT'S SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Governor Palin was chastised because her husband had a DUI 25 years ago and a socialists donkey nominees hubby is a tax deadbeat for 16 years and it's, Oh well???????????????

quote:

Originally posted by David Covey:
Someone has to explain to me how these FOB (friends of Bobs) get away with this..No wonder the country is going broke 54% of the country must not have paid their taxes

# 5?

Dave

Nevermind her role on the board of the pro-labor organization American Rights at Work.

No conflict of interest there, huh!?!?

That would be almost as bad as appointing an pro-abortion activist lawyer from the ACLU to the Supreme Court. Oh wait, that happened two presidencies ago. Dammit.

Here's another...Didn't Nobama support this??

This was one he actually showed up and voted for..

Dave

That's exactly what 0boy supported several times, no "PRESENT" votes for him on this issue!!!!!!!!!!

All Quiet on the Liberal Front here? Not for long, I'm sure.

I've tried to give the new Pres. the benefit of the doubt until he proves himself one way or the other. Boy, it didn't take long!

Suspicions confirmed! Hussein the Kenyan may have charisma, he may play a mean game of B-Ball and he can sure deliver a (prepared) speech, but executive he is NOT!! The Libs American Idol In Chief is an inept rookie; out of his league and in over his head. What else could we expect from a hack Chicago politician? A friggin' Community Organizer (whatever the hell that is)?
Next time you see one of these airhead voters in a Volvo with an Obama sticker on the bumper, pull them over and punch them in the mouth!

W, where are you now that we need you and miss you (compared to this pretty boy)?

In our town we have a road named Colon Powell Parkway. The City council is trying to rename it know Get this-New name Obama Parkway I KID YOU NOT

Yesterday President Obama broke a campaign pledge

Federal Cigarette Tax Increase Signed Into Law; Raises Taxes on Families Earning Under $250,000

by Joseph Henchman


President Obama yesterday signed into law H.R. 2, a 4-1/2 year reauthorization of the Children's Health Insurance Program (formerly State Children's Health Insurance Program). The bill is estimated to fund health insurance for the existing 7 million beneficiaries, and expand it to a net further 4 million at 300% of the poverty level with the most favorable federal matching funds. (I say "net" because it takes into account children who currently have private insurance, and a smaller number who have Medicaid, who will be induced to drop it and enter the more generous government program.) It had passed the House by a vote of 290-135 and the Senate by a vote of 66-32.

The "pay for" for the reauthorization is a hike in the federal cigarette tax from 39 cents per 20-cigarette pack to $1.0066 per 20-cigarette pack, effective March 31, 2009. As my colleague Gerald Prante and I noted, a politically popular and expensive program should never be funded by a small, low-income, politically unpopular minority like cigarette smokers. Just because the government needs revenue to fund some general spending program that has broad benefits doesn't mean that an arbitrarily selected group of people should pay the tax. Popular, expensive, broadly available public programs should be paid for with broad-based taxes on income or consumption. In our paper, we run through many of the non-revenue reasons for raising cigarette taxes for S-CHIP and find them wanting.

As some have noted, this law breaks President Obama's campaign pledge that "no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase...not any of your taxes." According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 95.8% of tobacco expenditures are made by consumer units (people spending together) who earn under $150,000 a year. Essentially all of this tax increase will be paid by families earning less than $250,000, and probably those earning substantially less than that.


Here's the video of the President's campaign pledge






Zell/Granny 2012

Send Your Thanks To the U.S.Military

Post a Message to our Soldiers

Of all the things I've lost,
I miss my mind the most
Grandpa Bob
Professional Fence Hanger / Spectator
Former Crew Chief
Grandma's Rocking Chair

Only words Grandma...They mean nothing to a liberal when running for office..We haven't seen anything yet, he will raise taxes on "the rich" whoever that is and then give it to the needy (in his eyes) so they can afford to buy their smokes.
Ya see this is another way to spread socialism and get the money by taxing the greedy rich..

Here it is in a different way for those who have only air between their ears...

Tax the poor by going after their beer/smokes/McDonalds, etc., then attempt to make everyone feel bad about them not having what everyone else has, now raise taxes on those who have won life's lottery to pay for what you couldn't get by going for it directly.
Just another shady LIBERAL politician.

Dave

Grandma,

What the vast majority, and obviously our "leaders" in Washington, fail to realize is that anytime you raise a consumer tax this drastically it has the reverse effect. Instead of tax revenue increasing from the tax they actually decrease because people who are light or casual smokers tend to quit the habit due to the expense. Or people find ways to buy them and avoid paying the tax... criminal enterprises have thrived on pirated cigarettes and booze for decades. It's another instance of refusing to look at historical facts.

Proof is in the similar increase New York enacted a few years ago. They were expecting windfall revenues from a new $1 (approx amount, don't remember exact) per pack tax to pay for some new program. What happened was a decrease in cigarette tax revenues to an amount lower than what was generated prior to the increase.

Several years ago the socialist government to the north of us jacked their cigarette tax to the moon.
It was there for a couple of years before they decided to lower it because there were places in Quebec openly selling cigarettes for less then the tax was!!!!!!!!!!!!!