quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:
Whats with the name calling cov?

That puts you in the typical response from a far right extremist when all you have left is to attack the messenger.

It was your link cov.....


And you have the nerve to accuse someone for being off their meds......

This from a left wing loon!!!


Ok, I'll try one more time...Just because I'm a glutton for punishment I guess...

OF COURSE IT WAS MY LINK...I POSTED IT..

IT ILLISTRATED THE HYPOCRACY OF YOU LIBERALS USEING THE SAME THING YOU DUMMIES WERE ACCUSING PALIN OF DOING.
Now you want to divert from the fact they specified individuals in their TARGET LIST and attempt to say they were talking about districts then you obviously are as ignorant as I have accused you of being.. The targets were running for office in their districts.

Lastly I don't think I called you a name.. I may have inadvertently stated a fact which by accident you picked up on..

Furthermore stay out of my conversations with BD.. Our conversations are over your head..

Dave

quote:

Furthermore stay out of my conversations with BD.. Our conversations are over your head..

Clown, you called me out.

There, i stated a fact.....

Yes, you are a glutton for stupidity in not knowing what you post.
Your link did not mirror your posted comment.

quote:

Originally posted by Bob H:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/vid....sheriff.bigotry.cnn

What is Dupnik's political affiliation?

Dupnik is a Democrat.

When has Dupnik made the news before?

Dupnik was a vocal opponent of Arizona's S.B.1070, a law designed to rid the state of illegal immigrants by criminalizing their efforts to work , defining their presence in the state as trespass, and mandating immigration status checks during routine police stops. In April, Dupnik used strong language to condemn the law, calling it "racist," "disgusting" and "stupid" as well as unnecessary.

In an unusual move for a law enforcement official, Dupnik vowed he would not enforce the law. Dupnik's stand drew applause from the law's opponents and criticism from its supporters, including a Facebook fan page.

In September Dupnik again made news when he publicly associated the Tea Party movement with bigotry.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/201..._pima_county_sheriff

Callings others over the top for their speech is funny coming from a man who has been over the top in his own speech and openly saying he will not enforce the laws he has sworn to uphold.

...

There has always been a lot of political "terrorism" in this country. Politicians warning their constituents of bad things going to happen to them if so or so gets elected to office.

Fear of the unknown is a huge motivating factor in the election process. That is to say, that a voter may vote for one he is displeased with rather than take a chance on a candidate that has not been in office.

Terrorism in and of itself is a political weapon.

The whack-job shooter's former classmates describe him as a LEFT-WING pothead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
'nuff said, he took the blurb on daily kos literally!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OR, maybe "imam 0-bomb" assertion, "if they bring a knife to the fight we'll bring a gun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Maybe the Daily KOS and the DLC should join Palin. Ya know that w h o l e goose and gander thing..

Last slide tells it all..

Dave

The ever crawfishing, foot stuck in their mouth, Palin camp now says that surveyor's marks were used to denote certain Congressional districts.

Ok, now I have been around surveying a long time, and yes the symbol, 79 of the attached image:



is one which is sometimes used to denote a Benchmark, or point of known elevation to be used in construction of a project.

So, does this now mean that these Congressional districts were denoted as "benchmarks"?

Now some deranged instrument man will laser some poor ******* because they have a benchmark symbol associated with them.

The Palin camp had no thought of surveying in mind when these symbols were placed on the map. Caribou Barbie is a gun toting crazy ***** and she was "targeting" these districts and the symbols were not surveyor's marks. The symbols portrayed what they intended them to be. Gun sights. Any story is OK I suppose.

If it was all innocent, why was it taken off her facebook pages after the incident?

In case you missed it the whack-job shooter, according to acquaintances, was a LEFT-WING POTHEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Being what he was I'll wager he spent his time on daily kos, who posted "she is dead to me now", and other over-the-cliff left-wing blogs and not on Governor Palin's web site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How long will it be before a left-wing lame stream moron media outlet discovers this whack-jobs acquaintances have labeled him a LEFT-WING POTHEAD?????????????????????????

I think he must be a tool of the Left Wing who has used this incident as a reason to delay the rescinding of Obama care. The vote has been put off. The same Left Wing is using Palin's innocent targeting of certain Congressional districts to throw us off the scent. I just bet Obama was in the White House with his hands over his ears when the shots went off.

Your sarcasm certainly doesn't relate to my position!
I'm pointing out the slanted reporting by the left-wing lame stream moron media regarding this matter, NOT doing what the left-wing lame stream moron media and the socialist dumkies are trying to do, specifically blame somebody!
Now the FBI director has undercut his regime cronies saying it was simply a madman!
Compare this to the islamist terrorist that gunned down even more people at Ft Hood, in that instance the regime and left-wing lame stream moron media DEMANDED NOBODY jump to conclusions about what had happened??????????????????

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Bill Koski,

quote:

Originally posted by BD:
There has always been a lot of political "terrorism" in this country. Politicians warning their constituents of bad things going to happen to them if so or so gets elected to office.

Fear of the unknown is a huge motivating factor in the election process. That is to say, that a voter may vote for one he is displeased with rather than take a chance on a candidate that has not been in office.

Terrorism in and of itself is a political weapon.

Obama: ‘If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun’.

Mobster wisdom tells us never to bring a knife to a gun fight. But what does political wisdom say about bringing a gun to a knife fight?

That’s exactly what Barack Obama said he would do to counter Republican attacks “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night. “Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”

Barack Obama’s call for ‘new politics’ is officially over. In just 24 hours, Barack Obama attacked one of America’s pioneering women CEOs, rejected a series of joint bipartisan town halls, and said that if there’s a political knife fight, he’d bring a gun,”

I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl








Gene Simmons Military Tribute

Zell/Granny 2012

Send Your Thanks To the U.S.Military

Post a Message to our Soldiers

Of all the things I've lost,
I miss my mind the most
Grandpa Bob
Professional Fence Hanger / Spectator
Former Crew Chief
Grandma's Rocking Chair

What a bunch!
Now we have socialist dumkey strategists PUBLICLY urging "imam 0-bomb" to do what the rapist did after the Oklahoma City bombimg! Seize this event as a catalyst to improve his stature by blaming the ultra right-wing for this tragedy!
This proves the socialist dumkies adhere to "dead-fish" rhambo's motto, "never let a crisis go to waste!"

Keep drinking that limpball kool aid.

quote:

Originally posted by Phil1934:
...

On November 5, 2009, Maj. Nidal Hasan opened fire at a troop readiness center in Ft. Hood, Texas, killing 13 people. Within hours of the killings, the world knew that Hasan reportedly shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before he began shooting, visited websites associated with Islamist violence, wrote Internet postings justifying Muslim suicide bombings, considered U.S. forces his enemy, opposed American involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan as wars on Islam, and told a neighbor shortly before the shootings that he was going "to do good work for God." There was ample evidence, in other words, that the Ft. Hood attack was an act of Islamist violence.

Nevertheless, public officials, journalists, and commentators were quick to caution that the public should not "jump to conclusions" about Hasan's motive.


"The important thing is for everyone not to jump to conclusions," said retired Gen. Wesley Clark on CNN the night of the shootings.

"We cannot jump to conclusions," said CNN's Jane Velez-Mitchell that same evening. "We have to make sure that we do not jump to any conclusions whatsoever."

"I'm on Pentagon chat room," said former CIA operative Robert Baer on CNN, also the night of the shooting. "Right now, there's messages going back and forth, saying do not jump to the conclusion this had anything to do with Islam."

The next day, President Obama underscored the rapidly-forming conventional wisdom when he told the country, "I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts." In the days that followed, CNN jouralists and guests repeatedly echoed the president's remarks.



Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/...n-afte#ixzz1Afo0sJxJ

quote:

Now we have socialist dumkey strategists PUBLICLY urging "imam 0-bomb" to do what the rapist did after the Oklahoma City bombimg!

Just as a languishing G.W. Bush presidency used 9-11 as a godsend for his administration.

BIG DIFFERENCE!
Never once did Preisdent Bush blame the previous regime for anything that happened!
EVEN though the rapist regime had ham strung the intelligence agencies and the FBI so that they couldn't even exchange data or compare notes!
IF President Bush had turned down at least five chances to take osama into custody can you imagine the screeching that would be going on to this day?

Clinton's dire public warnings about the threat posed by terrorism, and the actions taken to thwart it, went completely unreported by the media, which was far more concerned with stained dresses and baseless Drudge Report rumors. When the administration did act militarily against bin Laden and his terrorist network, the actions were dismissed by partisans within the media and Congress as scandalous "wag the dog" tactics. The news networks actually broadcast clips of the movie "Wag the Dog" while reporting on his warnings, to accentuate the idea that everything the administration said was contrived fakery.

In Congress, Clinton was thwarted by the reactionary conservative majority in virtually every attempt he made to pass legislation that would attack al-Qaeda and terrorism. His 1996 omnibus terror bill, which included many of the anti-terror measures we now take for granted after September 11, was withered almost to the point of uselessness by attacks from the right; Senators Jesse Helms and Trent Lott were openly dismissive of the threats Clinton spoke of.

Specifically, Clinton wanted to attack the financial underpinnings of the al-Qaeda network by banning American companies and individuals from dealing with foreign banks and financial institutions that al-Qaeda was using for its money-laundering operations. Texas Senator Phil Gramm, chairman of the Banking Committee, gutted the portions of Clinton's bill dealing with this matter, calling them "totalitarian."

In fact, Gramm was compelled to kill the bill because his most devoted patrons, the Enron Corporation and its criminal executives in Houston, were using those same terrorist financial networks to launder their own dirty money and rip off the Enron stockholders. It should also be noted that Gramm's wife, Wendy, sat on the Enron Board of Directors.

Just before departing office, Clinton managed to make a deal with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to have some twenty nations close tax havens used by al-Qaeda. His term ended before the deal was sealed, and the incoming Bush administration acted immediately to destroy the agreement.

According to Time magazine, in an article entitled "Banking on Secrecy" published in October of 2001, Bush economic advisors Larry Lindsey and R. Glenn Hubbard were urged by think tanks like the Center for Freedom and Prosperity to opt out of the coalition Clinton had formed. The conservative Heritage Foundation lobbied Bush's Treasury Secretary, Paul O'Neill, to do the same.

In the end, the lobbyists got what they wanted, and the Bush administration pulled out of the plan. The Time article stated, "Without the world's financial superpower, the biggest effort in years to rid the world's financial system of dirty money was short-circuited."

ABC's miniseries skates right over this, and likewise refuses to address the myriad ways in which the Bush administration failed completely to defend this nation from attack. All the efforts put forth by the Clinton administration were cast aside when Bush took office, simply because they wanted nothing to do with the outgoing government. Condoleezza Rice, by her own admission, did not even bother to look at the massive compendium of al-Qaeda data compiled by Sandy Berger until the morning of September 11.

After the attacks, virtually every member of the Bush administration put forth the talking point that, "No one could have anticipated anyone using airplanes as bombs." The facts tell a different story.