Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Ideas?
 Login/Join
 
DRR Pro
Picture of Footloose
posted Hide Post
Thats sad you start going good rounds then this crap starts. After you fix it they gonna be visiting the buy back windows. Wink
 
Posts: 1922 | Location: in a van down buy the river | Registered: September 07, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Footloose:
Thats sad you start going good rounds then this crap starts. After you fix it they gonna be visiting the buy back windows. Wink


Drivers are picking up the parts as of today - will have it back together tonight and be racing tomorrow night for some testing and redialing in of items....then points Saturday.

Logging, and other items I will look into.

Appeciate the help.

The converter was from 2004! It probably only had about 3500 passes on it. Carl has checked it before and when I asked him about freshening he always said dont fix what isnt broken - the converter also was SUPER consistent and slip % were unheard of...so I was always afraid to touch it.
Guess I cant complain - unfortunately it took out the trans in the process.

I upgraded to ringless shaft and some other billet stuff while Carl had it apart to support the new motor. Snowball effect.
 
Posts: 1464 | Location: St Marys | Registered: January 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
Picture of CURTIS REED
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ski_dwn_it:
quote:
Originally posted by Footloose:
Thats sad you start going good rounds then this crap starts. After you fix it they gonna be visiting the buy back windows. Wink


Drivers are picking up the parts as of today - will have it back together tonight and be racing tomorrow night for some testing and redialing in of items....then points Saturday.

Logging, and other items I will look into.

Appeciate the help.

The converter was from 2004! It probably only had about 3500 passes on it. Carl has checked it before and when I asked him about freshening he always said dont fix what isnt broken - the converter also was SUPER consistent and slip % were unheard of...so I was always afraid to touch it.
Guess I cant complain - unfortunately it took out the trans in the process.

I upgraded to ringless shaft and some other billet stuff while Carl had it apart to support the new motor. Snowball effect.


Don't forget to flush your cooler. If you mentioned that I missed it.



____________________________
2017 and 2018 Osage Casinos Tulsa Raceway Park No-Box Champion

2018 Div4 Goodguys Hammer award winner
 
Posts: 3189 | Location: KIEFER, OK. | Registered: August 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
posted Hide Post
Yep. Just ripped all the lines and cooler out to do exactly that. Fun fun
 
Posts: 1464 | Location: St Marys | Registered: January 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Top Comp
posted Hide Post
Cool, I bet it runs better. Torque converter technology has come a long way since 2004, spragless I'm sure.

If you're going ringless input that means you're gonna need a pump too. Although if your pump looks good they'll incorporate a T400 stator tube in it, in order to make it happen.

Keep us posted Good Luck!
 
Posts: 9398 | Location: Madeira Beach Fl. | Registered: June 12, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
posted Hide Post
Car gained a bunch of MPH. Usually around 152-153.

About fell over when it went 159 first run. KNew it was flying because it tripped the rev limiter.

Made some small adjustments and it went 158.XX and repeated well.

Not bad for a car that weighs 3330lbs



Not bad for a car that weighs

dont mind the lights - I was playing with just-in-time

This message has been edited. Last edited by: ski_dwn_it,
 
Posts: 1464 | Location: St Marys | Registered: January 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Top Comp
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ski_dwn_it:
Car gained a bunch of MPH. Usually around 152-153.

About fell over when it went 159 first run. KNew it was flying because it tripped the rev limiter.

Made some small adjustments and it went 158.XX and repeated well.

Not bad for a car that weighs 3330lbs



Not bad for a car that weighs


How much quicker to the 60ft?
 
Posts: 9398 | Location: Madeira Beach Fl. | Registered: June 12, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post



DRR Sportsman
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Rietow:
quote:
Originally posted by ski_dwn_it:
Car gained a bunch of MPH. Usually around 152-153.

About fell over when it went 159 first run. KNew it was flying because it tripped the rev limiter.

Made some small adjustments and it went 158.XX and repeated well.

Not bad for a car that weighs 3330lbs



Not bad for a car that weighs


How much quicker to the 60ft?


On the average - none
 
Posts: 1464 | Location: St Marys | Registered: January 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


© DragRaceResults.com 2024