DRR Sportsman
| I have run Q16 since 2009 and never had an issue. but I live in the desert. I sold a car to a guy in the midwest and told him not to let the fuel sit in the engine and tank. He didn't listen and ended up with a lot of corrosion in the cylinders. He now will empty the tank and fire the car up on pump gas if it is going to sit for extended periods. We also have been running C45 for a few years on the heads uo car. Its Q on steroiods. Q has a VERY wide tuning window. Almost hard to hurt part with it. C45 on the other hand has a very narrow tuning window and it will hurt parts if it gets to fat.
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know." Marcus Tullius Cicero
|
| Posts: 1028 | Location: Las Vegas, NV | Registered: April 14, 2004 |
IP
|
|
DRR Trophy
| quote: Originally posted by Al Alguire: I have run Q16 since 2009 and never had an issue. but I live in the desert. I sold a car to a guy in the midwest and told him not to let the fuel sit in the engine and tank. He didn't listen and ended up with a lot of corrosion in the cylinders. He now will empty the tank and fire the car up on pump gas if it is going to sit for extended periods.
We also have been running C45 for a few years on the heads uo car. Its Q on steroiods. Q has a VERY wide tuning window. Almost hard to hurt part with it. C45 on the other hand has a very narrow tuning window and it will hurt parts if it gets to fat.
I have ran Q16 for many years now. As Al said, it's a very forgiving fuel with a wide tuning range, also very consistent running fuel. At one time I had my bbc at BES for upgrades. Was running a Dale Cubic 2.4" blade billet dominator with tuneups for Q16 and C45 which entailed jet, emulsion and air bleed changes. On the dyno C45 was only worth 9hp over Q16. Put the tuneup back to Q16 as hurting the engine wasn't worth it for only 9hp. |
| |