|
Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
DRR Top Comp |
| ||
|
DRR Trophy |
The one on the right and only unusable because it’s a stock shaft and not strong enough | |||
|
DRR Pro |
Middle one, don't know why/have a clue as to what's usable or not. 1980 Camaro Taking the Best Working Small Tire Shyt Box & making it Greater Than Before! 3000 lbs. Pump Gas 436 | |||
|
DRR Pro |
Does the left shaft have any numbers? I "think" it would be my choice because of the dual sealing rings but I would like to know if it can be identified. Also, what power/performance range will this be? Larry Woodfin | |||
|
DRR Pro |
Mike, after rechecking I now see it is a trick question. Larry Woodfin | |||
|
DRR Pro |
I was going after "which one is usable" Larry Woodfin | |||
|
DRR Pro |
None of them, the are being unused as they are pictured. 1980 Camaro Taking the Best Working Small Tire Shyt Box & making it Greater Than Before! 3000 lbs. Pump Gas 436 | |||
|
DRR Sportsman |
I don't want the ringless shaft therefore it is unuseable to me. ep | |||
|
DRR Top Comp |
Why is that? | |||
|
DRR Top Comp |
No numbers Larry, it's an input shaft I've had for years, I use as a fixture to lay any new input I receive next too, in order to judge the new shafts worth. The input on the left is what you don't want. Look at the placement of the top ring journal. | |||
|
DRR Sportsman |
Unless the middle one is ATI super shaft they are all unusable to me. Ringless super shafts and ATI Super Pumps in both cars here..... | |||
|
DRR Top Comp |
Hmmm, yeah that's a successful combination of parts. I use the shaft on the left as a rudimentary standard to compare any new shaft I receive. The shaft on the left top ring journal obstructs lube orifice in the stator (in cooler).It's what you don't want to see in a input shaft. | |||
|
DRR Pro |
BTE high volume pump and ringless input shaft here..... Mark Goulette Owner/Driver of the Livin' The Dream Racing dragster www.livinthedreamracing.com "Speed kills but it's better than going slow!" Authorized Amsoil Retailer | |||
|
DRR Sportsman |
TSI Pro mod pump and ringless shaft. Done | |||
|
DRR Sportsman |
ran one years ago and found that it did not charge the converter as well as a ringed shaft. .10 difference between a ringed vs ringless is what I found on my stuff. ep | |||
|
DRR Top Comp |
That's a good point but for future it wasn't how the converter was charged which made the difference. It was the oil flow exiting the converter. If it slowed a tenth it most likely made more converter pressure with the ringless and tightened the converter. This would be a circumstance proprietary to the specific torque converter in play only. For example I do the engine and transmission on a heads up car we have a high flow ringless input shaft and pump, and we have a high flow ringed input and pump. Until we discover through testing and modifications, we won't know exactly which combination of parts will result in the quickest incremental times and et's. | |||
|
DRR Sportsman |
I just know that one was .10 slower than the other so therefore I like a ringed shaft. may have been me or coincidence. ep | |||
|
DRR Sportsman |
I only run a Sniper Quad Core Damascus Steel with Quad Bi Directional Rings. | |||
|
DRR Trophy |
Are the two shafts for the same application? I thinking one is for a factory 1.82 and one for a factory 1.76. That would put the rings in different locations when measured from that end because the 1.82 and the 1.76 carriers are different. | |||
|
DRR Top Comp |
Are you sure about that? What's a 1.76 measure? | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |