quote:

This worker’s $888 weekly unemployment check would exceed their $577 paycheck over four months.

quote:

Originally posted by Canted Valve:

quote:

This worker’s $888 weekly unemployment check would exceed their $577 paycheck over four months.

We love to hold the individual accountable, and that's fine they should be. For example they sell alcohol in convenience stores, bars, taverns, pubs, clubs, etc., etc., and they all sell liquor by the drink and they all have parking lots. Yet we love to hold the individual accountable while facilitating drunk driving. More to the point, the portion of the $2.2T going to individuals is by far the smaller portion of the total. But at least it's can and will be accounted for. But what about the corporate welfare? Not saying some isn't warranted, but one thing is for sure, there will be no accounting, at least to the public and we will never know what went where. So, worrying about the lesser portion of the $2.2T, the individuals benefits, is kinda like stepping over a dollar to pick up a dime. Just sayin.

quote:

Originally posted by Canted Valve:
More to the point, the portion of the $2.2T going to individuals is by far the smaller portion of the total. But at least it's can and will be accounted for. But what about the corporate welfare? Not saying some isn't warranted, but one thing is for sure, there will be no accounting, at least to the public and we will never know what went where.

quote:

Originally posted by Canted Valve:

quote:

This worker’s $888 weekly unemployment check would exceed their $577 paycheck over four months.

We love to hold the individual accountable, and that's fine they should be. For example they sell alcohol in convenience stores, bars, taverns, pubs, clubs, etc., etc., and they all sell liquor by the drink and they all have parking lots. Yet we love to hold the individual accountable while facilitating drunk driving. More to the point, the portion of the $2.2T going to individuals is by far the smaller portion of the total. But at least it's can and will be accounted for. But what about the corporate welfare? Not saying some isn't warranted, but one thing is for sure, there will be no accounting, at least to the public and we will never know what went where. So, worrying about the lesser portion of the $2.2T, the individuals benefits, is kinda like stepping over a dollar to pick up a dime. Just sayin.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Rietow:

quote:

Originally posted by Canted Valve:

quote:

This worker’s $888 weekly unemployment check would exceed their $577 paycheck over four months.

We love to hold the individual accountable, and that's fine they should be. For example they sell alcohol in convenience stores, bars, taverns, pubs, clubs, etc., etc., and they all sell liquor by the drink and they all have parking lots. Yet we love to hold the individual accountable while facilitating drunk driving. More to the point, the portion of the $2.2T going to individuals is by far the smaller portion of the total. But at least it's can and will be accounted for. But what about the corporate welfare? Not saying some isn't warranted, but one thing is for sure, there will be no accounting, at least to the public and we will never know what went where. So, worrying about the lesser portion of the $2.2T, the individuals benefits, is kinda like stepping over a dollar to pick up a dime. Just sayin.

You got that right brother, 1% of the people get 99% of the socialism.

quote:

Originally posted by Trans Lady:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Rietow:

quote:

Originally posted by Canted Valve:

quote:

This worker’s $888 weekly unemployment check would exceed their $577 paycheck over four months.

We love to hold the individual accountable, and that's fine they should be. For example they sell alcohol in convenience stores, bars, taverns, pubs, clubs, etc., etc., and they all sell liquor by the drink and they all have parking lots. Yet we love to hold the individual accountable while facilitating drunk driving. More to the point, the portion of the $2.2T going to individuals is by far the smaller portion of the total. But at least it's can and will be accounted for. But what about the corporate welfare? Not saying some isn't warranted, but one thing is for sure, there will be no accounting, at least to the public and we will never know what went where. So, worrying about the lesser portion of the $2.2T, the individuals benefits, is kinda like stepping over a dollar to pick up a dime. Just sayin.

You got that right brother, 1% of the people get 99% of the socialism.

Let me ask you a question, are you going to send the check you get from the IRS back?

quote:

Originally posted by Trans Lady:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Rietow:

quote:

Originally posted by Canted Valve:

quote:

This worker’s $888 weekly unemployment check would exceed their $577 paycheck over four months.

We love to hold the individual accountable, and that's fine they should be. For example they sell alcohol in convenience stores, bars, taverns, pubs, clubs, etc., etc., and they all sell liquor by the drink and they all have parking lots. Yet we love to hold the individual accountable while facilitating drunk driving. More to the point, the portion of the $2.2T going to individuals is by far the smaller portion of the total. But at least it's can and will be accounted for. But what about the corporate welfare? Not saying some isn't warranted, but one thing is for sure, there will be no accounting, at least to the public and we will never know what went where. So, worrying about the lesser portion of the $2.2T, the individuals benefits, is kinda like stepping over a dollar to pick up a dime. Just sayin.

You got that right brother, 1% of the people get 99% of the socialism.

Let me ask you a question, are you going to send the check you get from the IRS back?

quote:

Originally posted by Bucky:
Not taking the check doesn't do anything with the socialism. It will go right on, and you will participate with your taxes. I'm not sure what the most effective way is to stop it. But I know the refusing the check isn't going to effect anything.

quote:

Originally posted by 442OLDS:
I fail to see why you would not accept a Government stimulus check if you get one.

What exactly are you accomplishing if you refuse it?

Let's say that you feel financially secure and have tons of money in your mattress.

I can see the Government (in the coming years) making cash illegal and not printing anymore.

I have a feeling that a cashless society is coming sooner than you think.

Those that have cash will be forced to deposit it somewhere or will forfeit it.

It seems ridiculous,but these are ridiculous times that we live in.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Rietow:

quote:

Originally posted by 442OLDS:
I fail to see why you would not accept a Government stimulus check if you get one.

What exactly are you accomplishing if you refuse it?

Let's say that you feel financially secure and have tons of money in your mattress.

I can see the Government (in the coming years) making cash illegal and not printing anymore.

I have a feeling that a cashless society is coming sooner than you think.

Those that have cash will be forced to deposit it somewhere or will forfeit it.

It seems ridiculous,but these are ridiculous times that we live in.

Cashless is about control.

I have no problem with anyone else taking the check, I understand debt K?

But see I was brought up to watch for what has and is taking place, so I have no debt. The reason I have no debt is because everything is made in china. Now on the other hand if everything was made in USA, there would be a future in debt, for OBVIOUS reasons. Obviously now there is no future in debt correct? Now if you weren't brought up to understand how this works I can understand why you'd have debt.

I was brought up like it was the great depression everyday. And to have a watchful eye for creeping communism.

Look if everything were made in USA we wouldn't be in this position. We'd just seal our borders and carry on producing and there would be a future in debt. I'm definitely not taking the check.
https://youtu.be/vAI2QOBMlTA
I understood what this video is saying the first time I saw it, because I was taught to look for creeping communism. To me IMO, this is the check, it's a stimulant.

quote:

Originally posted by 442OLDS:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Rietow:

quote:

Originally posted by 442OLDS:
I fail to see why you would not accept a Government stimulus check if you get one.

What exactly are you accomplishing if you refuse it?

Let's say that you feel financially secure and have tons of money in your mattress.

I can see the Government (in the coming years) making cash illegal and not printing anymore.

I have a feeling that a cashless society is coming sooner than you think.

Those that have cash will be forced to deposit it somewhere or will forfeit it.

It seems ridiculous,but these are ridiculous times that we live in.

Cashless is about control.

I have no problem with anyone else taking the check, I understand debt K?

But see I was brought up to watch for what has and is taking place, so I have no debt. The reason I have no debt is because everything is made in china. Now on the other hand if everything was made in USA, there would be a future in debt, for OBVIOUS reasons. Obviously now there is no future in debt correct? Now if you weren't brought up to understand how this works I can understand why you'd have debt.

I was brought up like it was the great depression everyday. And to have a watchful eye for creeping communism.

Look if everything were made in USA we wouldn't be in this position. We'd just seal our borders and carry on producing and there would be a future in debt. I'm definitely not taking the check.
https://youtu.be/vAI2QOBMlTA
I understood what this video is saying the first time I saw it, because I was taught to look for creeping communism. To me IMO, this is the check, it's a stimulant.

Having no or little debt would seem like a responsible way to live one's life.However,when all of this shakes out in the economy,the winners will probably be the ones with the most debt.

Some creditors will be forced to accept pennies on the dollar.

quote:

Originally posted by 442OLDS:
When you owe $100 to a bank,it is YOUR problem if you don't pay it.

If you owe $1,000,000 to a bank,the bank now has a problem.