DragRaceResults.Com    Bracket Talk    Bracket Talk Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Tech Talk - by Abruzzi    Converter spacing ?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Converter spacing ?
 Login/Join
 
DRR Sportsman
Picture of Mike Frizie
posted
Whats the thinnest spacer you’ve have to run on your converter? I can pin mine freely and it’s not touching the flex plate . Is it possible to not need one to your 1/8 gap? I know this a stupid question but pretty sure this is the first time I’ve run this ‘verter. HMMMM


Michael Frizie
ET 2471
 
Posts: 658 | Location: Winston, GA | Registered: April 10, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
Picture of Big Steve
posted Hide Post
With the converter push all the way back Spec is .125-.180 inch with or without any spacers if thats what your asking
 
Posts: 2657 | Location: Moving back to the door side | Registered: April 30, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
Picture of Mike Frizie
posted Hide Post
Correct. And thanks. But I was asking was is it possible to achieve the 1/8 I want with no spacer? Dad put the ‘verter in a swears it went down all the way. like is said , spins free and is not contacting flex plate. Confused


Michael Frizie
ET 2471
 
Posts: 658 | Location: Winston, GA | Registered: April 10, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Pro
Picture of rusty
posted Hide Post
if the convertor was built for your midplate by one of the major companys you shoudnt need a shim.if the convertor will turn it is in the pump gear properly.push all the way way in and measure.i like to be close to the 180 but steves numbers are good.


honesty is the best policy,insanity is a better deffense
1.036, 6.16@ 224

 
Posts: 1503 | Location: texas | Registered: February 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
Picture of Mike Frizie
posted Hide Post
10-4 guys. Thanks for the reassurance .


Michael Frizie
ET 2471
 
Posts: 658 | Location: Winston, GA | Registered: April 10, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Pro
posted Hide Post
Rusty is correct in that it would not spin if it were not all the way engaged. It is also correct that if you have between 1/8" - 3/16" clearance, no shim is needed. An easy way to measure is insert drill bit between flex plate and converter pad.


Larry Woodfin



 
Posts: 1959 | Location: Kilgore TX | Registered: March 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
posted Hide Post
quote:
is it possible to achieve the 1/8 I want with no spacer?


Yes

Bob
 
Posts: 3314 | Location: Lakeside, Ca | Registered: February 15, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post



DRR S/Pro
Picture of Lenny5160
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Larry Woodfin:
Rusty is correct in that it would not spin if it were not all the way engaged. It is also correct that if you have between 1/8" - 3/16" clearance, no shim is needed. An easy way to measure is insert drill bit between flex plate and converter pad.


Yep, I always bring 1/8" and 3/16" drill bits under the car with me. The 1/8" bit must fit between the converter and flexplate, but the 3/16" bit must not fit.


Tony Leonard
 
Posts: 3277 | Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN | Registered: March 18, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Top Comp
Picture of wideopen231
posted Hide Post
If reading correctly Issue is too little gap. If so you have to pace transmission or remove little material from converter mounting pads. Guess can send to have cut back or carefully grind them. If later I would mic pad slowly remove material to get gap needed and make sure to remove exact amount for all three. ALTHOUGH goes against my religion I would get close and finish with flat file. Any decent machinist could spin it up in lathe. That would be my choice.




America home of free. Brought to you by 2nd amendment.
 
Posts: 4680 | Location: Greensboro NC | Registered: May 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Pro
Picture of rusty
posted Hide Post
if not enough gap,when the flexplate flexes it will go in too far and wear the pump


honesty is the best policy,insanity is a better deffense
1.036, 6.16@ 224

 
Posts: 1503 | Location: texas | Registered: February 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
Picture of Mike Frizie
posted Hide Post
Update: I measured the gap by installing washers I couldn’t get in any more in, then mic ing the thickness and came up with .220 . So Plan is to install a.075 spacer onto each bolt , which should pull the ‘verter out .145, which should be inside the 1/8-3/16 spec?


Michael Frizie
ET 2471
 
Posts: 658 | Location: Winston, GA | Registered: April 10, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR S/Pro
Picture of Big Steve
posted Hide Post
.145 is perfect. Send it
 
Posts: 2657 | Location: Moving back to the door side | Registered: April 30, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Sportsman
Picture of Mike Frizie
posted Hide Post
Thanks just hard to believe the bbc is that odd ball of a piece to cause a variation with a major manufacturer . HMMMM


Michael Frizie
ET 2471
 
Posts: 658 | Location: Winston, GA | Registered: April 10, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
DRR Pro
Picture of FootbrakeJim
posted Hide Post
Michael, it sounds like a lot of slop, but it is definitely not limited to BBC applications. When you really think about it, that .120-.180" range (1/8-3/16") is a standard rule of thumb for any of our common racing platforms, GM, Ford, Mopar, and whatever converter & automatic trans you put behind it.
Think about the number of different parts that all get connected together, and the different possibilities for variations in the many manufacturing processes that feed into that total allowable range of variance, which is 1/16th of an inch. (.062"). That range is due to what they call "tolerance stacking" in manufacturing. There are a lot of different potential culprits in that chain. Engine blocks have allowable tolerance variations for the dimension from thrust bearing to the rear (bellhousing) surface. Thrust bearings have allowable tolerances for thickness of thrust flange. Crankshafts have multiple +/- dimensional tolerances, one of them being for the distance from thrust bearing fillets to the flex plate mounting flange, and also an operating / assembly clearance (allowable fore/aft movement) of the crank within the block. Flex plates have multiple tolerances, from disk material thickness, distance from converter pads to the plane of the base disk, etc. Torque converters have dimensional tolerances for various dimensions that would result in allowable variations of the total distance from the pump drive end to the flex plate mounting bosses. Trans Pumps have manufacturing tolerances. Transmission cases have casting and machining tolerances. If you had 2 complete assemblies, (Engine/Converter/Trans), and one of them had every dimension of every component at the allowable "maximum material condition" for all components, and the other unit had the opposite - all tolerances for every part were on the short end of all allowable variations, it is remarkable that a powertrain assembly plant could build hundreds, even thousands of completed assemblies per day. With each of the components coming from a separate manufacturing plant. So that converter snout, which can move a reasonable distance in or out of the trans pump, gives the automotive engineers a place to accommodate all the manufacturing variables of all the other components. Think of it like an expansion joint on a sidewalk. Big Grin
Yes, you could specify much tighter precision tolerances on every component, but your manufacturing costs would go up exponentially, and your production volume per day would go way down.


Dan "Jim" Moore
Much too young to feel this damn old!!
 
Posts: 1139 | Location: Farmersville, TX  | Registered: December 05, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post



DRR Pro
Picture of rusty
posted Hide Post
quote:
posted February 25, 2025 04:28 PM Hide Post
Michael, it sounds like a lot of slop, but it is definitely not limited to BBC applications. When you really think about it, that .120-.180" range (1/8-3/16") is a standard rule of thumb for any of our common racing platforms, GM, Ford, Mopar, and whatever converter & automatic trans you put behind it.
Think about the number of different parts that all get connected together, and the different possibilities for variations in the many manufacturing processes that feed into that total allowable range of variance, which is 1/16th of an inch. (.062"). That range is due to what they call "tolerance stacking" in manufacturing. There are a lot of different potential culprits in that chain. Engine blocks have allowable tolerance variations for the dimension from thrust bearing to the rear (bellhousing) surface. Thrust bearings have allowable tolerances for thickness of thrust flange. Crankshafts have multiple +/- dimensional tolerances, one of them being for the distance from thrust bearing fillets to the flex plate mounting flange, and also an operating / assembly clearance (allowable fore/aft movement) of the crank within the block. Flex plates have multiple tolerances, from disk material thickness, distance from converter pads to the plane of the base disk, etc. Torque converters have dimensional tolerances for various dimensions that would result in allowable variations of the total distance from the pump drive end to the flex plate mounting bosses. Trans Pumps have manufacturing tolerances. Transmission cases have casting and machining tolerances. If you had 2 complete assemblies, (Engine/Converter/Trans), and one of them had every dimension of every component at the allowable "maximum material condition" for all components, and the other unit had the opposite - all tolerances for every part were on the short end of all allowable variations, it is remarkable that a powertrain assembly plant could build hundreds, even thousands of completed assemblies per day. With each of the components coming from a separate manufacturing plant. So that converter snout, which can move a reasonable distance in or out of the trans pump, gives the automotive engineers a place to accommodate all the manufacturing variables of all the other components. Think of it like an expansion joint on a sidewalk.
Yes, you could specify much tighter precision tolerances on every component, but your manufacturing costs would go up exponentially, and your production volume per day would go way down.

Dan "Jim" Moore
Much too young to feel this damn old!!

and lol the pump gear is .375 thihick if the distance is not near center it will rise out and get on top of the gear or too deep and wear the pump.
when everthing was all factory used parts things were different for sure


honesty is the best policy,insanity is a better deffense
1.036, 6.16@ 224

 
Posts: 1503 | Location: texas | Registered: February 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

DragRaceResults.Com    Bracket Talk    Bracket Talk Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Tech Talk - by Abruzzi    Converter spacing ?

© DragRaceResults.com 2025