10:1 compression ratio 496<BR><BR>Edelbrock Victor Jr 454 intake, PEP 4340, Eagle H beams, JESEL Belt drive, SRP, Lunati, Crane rockers, Brodix stud girdle, PAC springs, COMP 10 degree titanium retainers, PAC locks, Melling Billet oil pump, Moroso oil pan with scraper and windage tray, ARP 4 bolt studs for additional windage tray, Morel lifter, Smith Bros pushrods, Pro Comp 320 machined and assembled in Tennessee with all Manley parts<BR><IMG class="inline_image" SRC="https://i.imgur.com/n1LBwfN.png"> Lunati solid roller Camshaft A?<BR><BR>Or Lunati solid roller Camshaft B?A?B?

B

quote:

Originally posted by Footloose:
B

That camshaft made 550 pd ft tq at 6700 rpm in a 11:1 468

Hp (702) = 550 x 6700 / 5252

If it made 585 @ 6800 in a 496 = 750 hp

Here's an even wilder version of the same approach. Saw it on FB market for sale tonight.

Vote, it's not rigged.

B

quote:

Originally posted by wideopen231:
B

So you prefer the tortoise (wide LSA's) to the hair (tight LSA's)?

mORE LOOKING AT EXHUAST VALVE timing and closing early usually has more cranking compression and most engine (most not all) like it better with big cams. As always head flows rules the world.