0boy isn't even in office yet and his Muslim brothers are beginning to turn on him because he had them believing he was going to side with them! YOU SEE, the American people weren't the only duped boobs he fooled!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NOW word is jenny the canuck might be on the list to replace the scandal plagued New Mexico Governor as Secretary of Commerce nominee?????????????? And here I thought 0boy had her on his economic team to advise him on what not to do, what she has done in Michigan!!!!!!!!!!!! This could be exciting news for Michiganians if the Lieutenant Governor isn't quite a big dupe for the unions as jenny has been!!!!!!!!!!!!This message has been edited. Last edited by: Bill Koski,
TAKE IT TO THE BANK!!!!! Later, Bill Koski
January 05, 2009, 10:26 PM
Trans Lady
Sasha and Malia start attending their new school today.......................
It seems hypocritical to me. Dem. politicians are against vouchers but they send their own children to private schools. They seem to feel public school are just great for everybody else's kids. If Obama see private schools as superior, he should support vouchers, particulary in failing schools.
January 05, 2009, 10:30 PM
<Jeremy J.>
quote:
Originally posted by Trans Lady: Sasha and Malia start attending their new school today.......................
It seems hypocritical to me. Dem. politicians are against vouchers but they send their own children to private schools. They seem to feel public school are just great for everybody else's kids. If Obama see private schools as superior, he should support vouchers, particulary in failing schools.
You b1tch when he talks about spreading the wealth, you b1tch when he doesn't. Which one is it??
January 05, 2009, 10:35 PM
David Covey
quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy J.:
quote:
Originally posted by Trans Lady: Sasha and Malia start attending their new school today.......................
It seems hypocritical to me. Dem. politicians are against vouchers but they send their own children to private schools. They seem to feel public school are just great for everybody else's kids. If Obama see private schools as superior, he should support vouchers, particulary in failing schools.
You b1tch when he talks about spreading the wealth, you b1tch when he doesn't. Which one is it??
So now letting you keep part of what you would have sent in is spreading the wealth??
Dave
"It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance." -Thomas Sowell
January 05, 2009, 10:44 PM
Trans Lady
Jeremy, do you pay property taxes?
January 05, 2009, 10:44 PM
<Jeremy J.>
quote:
Originally posted by David Covey:
So now letting you keep part of what you would have sent in is spreading the wealth??
Dave
How are they any different?
January 05, 2009, 10:46 PM
<Jeremy J.>
quote:
Originally posted by Trans Lady: Jeremy, do you pay property taxes?
What's that got to do with it?
January 05, 2009, 10:50 PM
Trans Lady
Well if you do, look and see where the money goes.
And I don't mind money going to children.
Alot different then the Democrats plan to spread the wealth.
January 05, 2009, 10:54 PM
<Jeremy J.>
quote:
Originally posted by Trans Lady: Well if you do, look and see where the money goes.
And I don't mind money going to children.
Alot different then the governments plan to spread the wealth.
What difference does it make if you get a "spread the wealth check" (paid for by taxes) or a tax credit? If you start handing out vouchers for private education, that's LESS money that will go towards public education. Isn't our education system screwed up enough as it is?
January 05, 2009, 11:29 PM
Trans Lady
Jeremy, the vouchers don't have to be just for private education, it could also go to a better public school.
They did that here but I don't know if they still do. If a child was in a failing public school a parent could put them in a better public school if they wanted to.
January 05, 2009, 11:37 PM
<Jeremy J.>
January 05, 2009, 11:44 PM
Trans Lady
January 05, 2009, 11:49 PM
Bob H
quote:
Originally posted by Trans Lady: Sasha and Malia start attending their new school today.......................
It seems hypocritical to me. Dem. politicians are against vouchers but they send their own children to private schools. They seem to feel public school are just great for everybody else's kids. If Obama see private schools as superior, he should support vouchers, particulary in failing schools.
Do you know why they selected this school for their children?????
January 05, 2009, 11:55 PM
Trans Lady
Why was his kids in a private school in Chicago before anyone ever heard of him???????????
January 05, 2009, 11:58 PM
<Jeremy J.>
Regardless of where their kids go to school, supporting school vouchers and criticizing spreading the wealth is just hypocritical. Same source, different name.
January 06, 2009, 12:00 AM
Trans Lady
January 06, 2009, 12:00 AM
Bob H
The girls were already in private schools in Chicago. The school hosted other presidental children.
Wouldn't you want the best for your children?
You far righties are getting desparate when you bring the kids into the spotlight.
Originally posted by Trans Lady: Why was his kids in a private school in Chicago before anyone ever heard of him???????????
Maybe they could afford to send them to a school of their choice.
They paid out of pocket as well as paid taxes.
Translady, if you had alot of money and you had a choice of sending your children to Harvard or Joe's transmission repair school, who would you choose????????
